There isn't enough info to prove the triangles to be congruent or not. So we can't say for sure either way.
We have angle CAD = angle ACB given by the arc markings, and we know that AC = AC due to the reflexive theorem. However we are missing one third piece of information.
That third piece of info could be....
- AD = BC which allows us to use SAS
- angle ACD = angle CAB which allows us to use ASA
- angle ABC = angle CDA which allows us to use AAS (slight variation of ASA)
Since we don't know any of those three facts, we simply don't have enough information.
side note: If AB = CD, then this leads to SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem. If we had two congruent sides, the angle must be between the two sides, which is what AD = BC allows.
<span>A meeting lasted from 11:15 am until 1:00 pm. how long was the meeting?
We have 1:00 pm= 13.00
13.00-11.15= 1.45
The meeting was 1 hour and 45 minutes</span>
Answer:
174lbs
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not positive but its my best shot
Answer:
Thank you could I possibly get brainliest if you don't want to it's okay just asking
Step-by-step explanation:
Have a good day/night :)