Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
The make-to-stock manufacturing (MTS) strategy can be described as producing products to put into stock based on a demand forecast.
In this strategy, companies do not maintain productive stability over a period of time, but adjust their manufacturing strategy according to times when demand can increase or decrease.
Some advantages of the make-to-stock strategy are:
- Economy of scale.
- Waste reduction.
- Efficiency in the use of resources.
- Increased response time.
So this is an effective manufacturing strategy for companies that can accurately forecast their demand.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/24099922
Please attach the graph if you can. Otherwise, I cannot answer this question
<span>When the economist says that material wants are insatiable, he means that these wants are virtually unlimited and therefore incapable of complete satisfaction. Insatiable means that they are impossibly to satisfy. In the economic world it is best to make use of the limited resources to help satisfy virtually unlimited wants. </span>
Answer:
Option A Stars
Explanation:
The reason is tha according to Boston Consulting Models the Business Units that possess high growth potential and this has been proven by capturing the market share with a good market share growth is Star. The business units like Star are the key to success and the businesses which possesses such business units must invest on it to expand its operation and further increase its market share to be a leader in the market.
