1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksenya-84 [330]
3 years ago
7

1) Decide whether you would expect relationship between the following pairs of dependent and independent variables (respectively

) to be positive, negative, or ambiguous. Explain your reasoning. a. Aggregate net investment in the United States in a given year and GDP in that year. b. The number of acres of wheat planted in a season and the price of wheat at the beginning of that season. c. Aggregate net investment and the real rate of interest in the same year and country. d. The quantity of canned tuna demanded and the real price of a can of tuna. e. The growth rate of GDP in a year and the average hair length in that year.
Business
1 answer:
kvasek [131]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

(a) GDP is a dependent variable and aggregate net investment is a independent variable. There is a positive relationship between the variables which means that an increase in the net investment will lead to increase GDP.

(b) There is a negative relationship between the variables which means that as the supply of wheat increases, as a result price of wheat falls. So, as the number of acres of wheat planted in a season  increases as a result price of wheat decline.

(c) There is a negative relationship between the variables which means that an increase in the interest rate in an economy will lead to increase the cost of borrowings and hence, net investment falls.

(d) There is a negative relationship between the variables because of the law of demand. It states that an increase in the price of a commodity will lead to reduce the quantity demanded for that commodity.

(e) There is no relationship between these variables. Both the variables are totally uncorrelated.

You might be interested in
Absorption and Variable Costing Comparisons: Production Equals Sales Assume that Smuckers manufactures and sells 30,000 cases of
pantera1 [17]

Answer:

a:<u>Total Variable Costs        $26 </u>    

a:<u>Total Manufacturing Costs = $ 30</u>  

b:<u>Net Income </u><u><em>Variable Costing</em></u><u>  $100,000</u>  

b: <u>Net Income  </u><u><em>Absorption Costing</em></u><u>  $ 100,000</u>

Explanation:

Smuckers Manufacturers

<u>Costs per case under  Variable Costing</u>

Direct materials per case 16

Direct labor per case 7

Variable manufacturing overhead per case 3

<u>Total Variable Costs        $26 </u>        

<u>Costs per case under  Absorption Costing</u>

Direct materials (30,000*16)              480,000

Direct labor (30,000*7)                    210,000

Variable manufacturing overhead  (30,000*3)   90,000

Total Variable Costs                                                       780,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead                           $120,000

Total Manufacturing Costs                                         $ 900,000

<u>Total Manufacturing Costs per Case= $ 900,000/ 30,000= $ 30</u>

The difference between the variable and absorption costing is that the product costs include variable and fixed costs in absorption costing. But in variable costing the product costs include only variable costs.

<u><em> SMUCKERS </em></u>

<u><em>Variable Costing Income Statement </em></u>

<u><em>For the Third Quarter of 2017 </em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Sales (30,000*34)                                                       1020,000  

Direct materials (30,000*16)              480,000

Direct labor (30,000*7)                    210,000

Variable manufacturing overhead  (30,000*3)   90,000

Total Variable Costs                                                       780,000

Contribution Margin                                                        240,000

Fixed Expenses                                                               140,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead      $120,000

Fixed selling and administrative 20,000

<u>Net Income                                                                   100,000</u>

In this case the net income under both variable and absorption costing does not change because the units produced are units sold. No cost is charged to ending inventory under absorption costing.

<u><em>SMUCKERS </em></u>

<u><em>Absorption Costing Income Statement </em></u>

<u><em>For the Third Quarter of 2017 </em></u>

Sales (30,000*34)                                                       1020,000  

Direct materials (30,000*16)              480,000

Direct labor (30,000*7)                    210,000

Variable manufacturing overhead  (30,000*3)   90,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead      $120,000

Total Manufacturing Costs                                              900,000

Gross Profit                                                                   120,000

Fixed Expenses                                                               20,000

Fixed selling and administrative 20,000

<u>Net Income                                                                   100,000</u>

3 0
4 years ago
On January 1, a company borrowed $50,000 cash by signing a 7% installment note that is to be repaid in 5 annual end-of-year paym
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

Please see attachment

Explanation:

Please see attachment

3 0
4 years ago
Question 4 (multiple choice)
Arturiano [62]
I believe the answer is "D."
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Barin Retail Outlets incorrectly recorded inventory in 2016. Rather than recording ending inventory as​ $960,000, Barin's accoun
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Please see attachment

Explanation:

Please see attachment

8 0
4 years ago
On January 1, 2014, Dodd, Inc., declared a 15% stock dividend on its common stock when the fair value of the common stock was $3
jeka94

Answer: $540,000

Explanation:

Given that,

Fair value of the common stock = $30 per share

Common stock, $10 par value, authorized 200,000 shares;

issued and outstanding 120,000 shares  = $1,200,000

Additional paid-in capital on common stock  = $150,000

Retained earnings  = $700,000

Total stockholders' equity  = $2,050,000

Declared a dividend of 15%:

=  120,000 × $30 × 15%

= $540,000

Since, dividends are paid out Retained earnings. Therefore, retained earnings will decrease by an amount of $540,000.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A produce distributor uses 774 packing crates a month, which it purchases at a cost of $12 each. The manager has assigned an ann
    9·1 answer
  • What is the e-file rejection error for an Invalid bank account or routing transit numbers?
    11·1 answer
  • California Inc., through no fault of its own, lost an entire plant due to an earthquake on May 1, 2021. In preparing its insuran
    11·1 answer
  • On December 1, Bruney Company introduces a new product that includes a one-year warranty on parts. In December, 1,000 units are
    9·1 answer
  • The means by which an organization will fulfill its purpose is referred to as its:
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following loans will typically offer the lowest interest rate? A:Payday loan B:Federal Student Loan C:Private Loan
    8·1 answer
  • About how frequently does Hope receive a paycheck?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain primary and secondary function​
    13·1 answer
  • During work flow analysis, an organization's planners need to analyze ______. (Check all that apply)
    11·1 answer
  • Scott's Cycles sells merchandise on credit terms of 2/15, n/30. A sale invoiced at $1,500 (cost of sales $975) was made to Shann
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!