D, these all apply
I just learned about this.
Answer:
I believe the answer is no.
Explanation:
My reasoning for this, is the only thing that any war does for Drug Cartels, is make them ramp up production, and increase prices. Also, bans on anything, only ensure that the thing being banned (as we can see with the alcohol ban in America History) will be greatly used. The only thing that can truly decrease the amount of drugs being used, is the people in the population.
Explanation:
U.S. foreign policy toward Latin America in the 19th century initially focused on excluding or limiting the military and economic influence of European powers, territorial expansion, and encouraging American commerce. These objectives were expressed in the No Transfer Principle (1811) and the Monroe Doctrine (1823). American policy was unilateralist (not isolationist); it gradually became more aggressive and interventionist as the idea of Manifest Destiny contributed to wars and military conflicts against indigenous peoples, France, Britain, Spain, and Mexico in the Western Hemisphere. Expansionist sentiments and U.S. domestic politics inspired annexationist impulses and filibuster expeditions to Mexico, Cuba, and parts of Central America. Civil war in the United States put a temporary halt to interventionism and imperial dreams in Latin America. From the 1870s until the end of the century, U.S. policy intensified efforts to establish political and military hegemony in the Western Hemisphere, including periodic naval interventions in the Caribbean and Central America, reaching even to Brazil in the 1890s. By the end of the century Secretary of State Richard Olney added the Olney Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine (“Today the United States is practically sovereign on this continent and its fiat is law upon the subjects to which it confines its interposition . . .”), and President Theodore Roosevelt contributed his own corollary in 1904 (“in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of wrongdoing or impotence, to exercise an international police power”). American policy toward Latin America, at the turn of the century, explicitly justified unilateral intervention, military occupation, and transformation of sovereign states into political and economic protectorates in order to defend U.S. economic interests and an expanding concept of national security.
Answer:
A and C just did the test and got 100% on it.
Explanation:
( : <3 : )
During the Industrial Revolution the workers were mainly European immigrants. They did hard labor in factories and sweat shops under awful conditions making items such as shirtwaists, hats, etc. They lived in cramped tenements and sometimes went to work in them. New immigrants accepted these jobs because they needed to earn a living somehow. The factory owners didn't treat their workers well because they were greedy. They cared more about making a profit rather than the well-being of their workers.
