A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.
Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.
Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300
#SPJ1
Hello there.
<span>Which of these is true of the century following the Pax Romana?
</span><span>C) The Roman military kept the empire's borders secure.</span>
Emperors
They the big boys of the Roman empire
Answer:
Treaty of Versailles and President Wilson's 14th points.
Explanation:
Both the Treaty of Versailles and 14th points are somewhat related as they both deals with Germany. Both tried to punish Germany because of the First World War which bought deaths and destruction.
Both wanted the return of Alsace Lorraine to France.
The 14th Points by President Wilson were less harsh than the Treaty of Versailles which was imposed by Allied powers with France, Britain, etc.
The 14 points are mainly to establish countries independence in Europe with peace. The treaty focuses on punishing the Germans by putting the blame and reparation terms.
It was the "Sons of Liberty" that was the organization that specifically promoted support for the war against the British among the american people, mainly due to grievances over taxation.
