<u>Answer:</u>
This statement is not true. It is a false statement because both these sub parts are not small or are not for kids. Both these are adults and are of legal age so they are not applied to juveniles.
Sub part C and D are found guilty of the crime that they have committed and are put behind the bars. They are imprisoned and not applied to juveniles for the modification in their behavior and to change them.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer:
earth-centered
Explanation:
Earth-centered worldviews: The term earth-centered worldviews is defined as a phenomenon that says all forms of life and human beings are considered as an interconnected parts related to the earth's life-support system and therefore it is everyone's responsibility or self-interest to not act or behave in a way that will lead to impair or harm the entire system.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the earth-centered worldviews.
Answer: MINDFULNESS
Explanation: Victoria is using her critical thinking skills to execute mindfulness.
Mindfulness in Psychology can be defined as aying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgementally which can develop through the practice of meditation, and other training.
It is an act of focusing one's attention at the present moment and accepting it without judgement.
Answer: Can you tell us the sentence?
Explanation:
