Answer:
We would need more information to answer.
Explanation:
The question which clarifies the process for the instruction above is:
"Why do you need to cut off extra fabric?". Hence the correct answer is C. Please note that the objective is to add a little color to the corkboard.
<h3>What is a Corkboard?</h3>
A corkboard is a bulletin board or a notice board whose surface is made out of cork.
In the instruction to cut off extra material was given but we are not told the reason why. Hence this question will clarify the process.
Learn more about sentence clarity at:
brainly.com/question/438006
Answer:
4.Address separate audiences separately.
Explanation:
The above statement is not a guideline for addressing your audience. When there is need for an audience to be addressed, there would be a stage in which the person who is the speaker would combine his or her various points into a summary in-order to capture the various differences among the audience.
<em>For example, on boarding school, the speaker should be able point out the advantages which is for audience in support of it as well as the differences (for audience against the idea) before pitching his summary on which he or she stands. This is more realistic rather than, trying to address audience separately.</em>
Answer:
2) . why didn't you arrive ? You should have been there .
Explanation : Firstly i chose this option cuz it was was asking why didn't u come ? so first ur asking why did she / he not come to the party .
secondly 'you should have been there ' it feels like u r telling that she / he shd have been there cuz everyone was there and all but only she / he weren't there .
<em>hope this helped !</em>
The option that describes a deconstructionist approach to a text is - complicate the meaning of the text.
Deconstructionists like to dig very deep into the text, and find meanings that aren't obvious at the first, second, or even the third glance. They like to analyze texts to such an extent that they bare everything within their interpretation, and get to the very core of the text, thus complicating something that would otherwise have been a simple analysis.