Answer:
C. Under the clause, states may not discriminate against citizens of other states in the buying and selling of property.
Explanation:
The Privileges and Immunities clause is found in Article IV of the United States Constitution and it prevents the states to treat in a discriminatory manner to citizens of other states. It also does not contain a market participation exception so, when the State acts as a supplier like in the case of selling or buying properties according to this clause it is forbidden to discriminate non-residents.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
Religious freedom is a democratic principle that is well exemplified in the American Constitution, being exhibited in the first constitutional amendment.
Explanation:
One of the main principles seen in democracy is the defense of popular freedom. An example of this can be seen in the first American constitutional amendment, which states that Congress and no governmental sphere can determine a religion to be followed, how to prevent worship and the celebration of any activity of any religion. This gives citizens the power of choice, which is strongly advocated within democratic concepts.
Answer:
The United States secretary of defense (SecDef) is the head of the United States Department of Defense.
America had 83% voter turnout
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
