Answer:
Explanation:
The California Republic is a western state of the United State. It shares its border with Mexico along the ocean, Pacific. In 2009, California is declared all over the media and the public as the "ungovernable state". They claimed that the Governors were not able to govern the state properly in conjunction to the legislature and the courts of the state. Decentring is used to remark the governance of the state that the governors have a dominion on the rule and that the directives are happening within the communal factors.
Some of the possible reasons are :
1. Proposition 13 : The effect of the proposition 13, the property tax limit measures that was passed in the year 1978 is the part of damage the initiative did to California.
2.Budget Initiative
3. Gerrymandering
4. Terms limit
5. Two thirds votes of the legislature to pass a budget.
6. Boom and the bust taxation.
The English Bill of Rights supported the following civil liberties for citizens:
- Defense against harsh penalty
- Possession of firearms
- The option of a jury trial Justification:
These three points support citizens with fair treatment and provide insurance for a decent standard of living. The first protects citizens from all forms of torture and mistreatment, the second permits gun ownership with the appropriate restrictions for regular citizens, and the third offers citizens with legal assistance if they are subjected to a procedure that must uphold all general rights.
In order to enshrine the rights of American citizens, the bill of rights was drafted. Additionally, it was done to prevent the government from encroaching on citizens' freedoms.
To know more about bill of rights: brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
Hello there, thank you for the question! ^w^
The correct answer would be true!
"Why did we ban retroactive criminal laws? Because they undermine the "central values" of free societies. To allow this would threated the rule of law itself, it would become a rule of officials instead."
Have a great day! <3
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.
Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;
-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and
-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.
The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.
On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or
-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults
#SPJ4
Because the states up north will get the most votes by which party they are by which is democratic, and the people in smaller states who might be conservatives don’t get as many votes , so the electoral college was formed to make it fair
