Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.
Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide
Answer:
D. They both serve as the head of political legislators from their political party
Explanation:
Answer:
A demurrer.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A pleading filed by one party to dismiss the other party's pleading for failing to state a cause of action is known as a demurrer.
This ultimately implies that, a demurrer is a pleading written by the defendant as a response to a court proceeding in which he or she acknowledges that the allegations in a complaint might be true and factual but it is insufficient to justify or establish a valid legal action.
For example, a party might file for a demurrer if a complaint infringes his or her right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in the Constitution.
