Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
Answer:
calmly, quietly
Explanation:
I. Why the concern about workplace privacy? ... innumerable levels, clearly increase efficiency in almost all tasks, allow for geographic and other ... suits, and finally, what employees should and can be doing to protect their privacy while at work. ... Still, this fear provides an incentive for some companies who harbor important ...
Answer:
Learn more about the powers of the Legislative Branch of the federal government of the United States. Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
Explanation:
Answer to the following question is as follows;
⇒ The Legality of Danny's Proposal;
- In this case, Danny's proposal is regarded an offer until it is approved by Alan in the market. As Danny's promised to sell 100 motorcycles for US$1000 each.
- The proposal from Danny's perspective is an offer since Alan did not acknowledge the agreement in the beginning. Once acknowledged by Allen, this exchanging of bikes becomes an offer.
⇒ Allan's response;
- Allan's response, on the other hand, was interpreted as offer and acceptance because no agreement was reached among them and Allan takes the bike only when it is in good shape.
- If the bikes are not in excellent condition, Allen has the right to decline the seller's contract at any moment.
Learn more about "Legal proposal"
brainly.com/question/13460236?referrer=searchResults
