This might help you
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
The answer is the second one,
;)
The statement provided from the Declaration of Independence is the document's minor premise, as stated in option B as further explained below.
<h3>What is a minor premise?</h3>
First, we need to understand that a premise is a statement that is fundamental for us to reach a conclusion. In the Declaration of Independence, we have a few major premises and, related to them,a few minor premises.
One of the major premises of the Declaration is that people have the right to rebel when their rights under attack. Thus, the statement we are analyzing here is a minor premise related to that major premise, as it states that the government of England is attacking Americans' rights.
With the information above in mind, we can choose option B as the correct answer.
Learn more about premises here:
brainly.com/question/16095426
#SPJ1
The answer is: You all.
It’s not that hard.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
distracted
[dəˈstraktəd]
ADJECTIVE
unable to concentrate because one's mind is preoccupied.
in this case, the boys mind is preoccupied with the noise.
