reasons why a cultural flowering such as the Harlem Renaissance is important to the progress of a people .

History

2 answers:

kakasveta [241]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: It reduced prejudice.

Explanation:

The Harlem Renaissance certainly had a positive echo in society. Primarily because African-American artists were the bearers of that cultural movement, in this way, African Americans became represented in the cultural and artistic community of the United States. It was a positive shift toward reducing racial prejudice because it was evident that talented artists were among the African American population. The movement has undoubtedly been a positive step towards the spread of art in the country.

Yuliya22 [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

reduced prejudice

Explanation:

The northern Manhattan neighborhood of Harlem was meant to be an upper-class white neighborhood in the 1880s, but rapid overdevelopment led to empty buildings and desperate landlords seeking to fill them.

In the early 1900s, a few middle-class Black families from another neighborhood known as Black Bohemia moved to Harlem, and other Black families followed. Some white residents initially fought to keep African Americans out of the area, but failing that many whites eventually fled.

You might be interested in

How does the u.s. constitution's structure reflect the values of the founding fathers?

ratelena [41]

I believe that although the constitution has not changed much since it was written, but I do believe that however, the interpretation of the constitution has changed over time. I believe that the Founding Fathers would be a little shocked if they were to travel through time and see how the US is right now.

4 0

3 years ago

it was a mistake for the United States to make an alliance with the Soviet totalitarian communist union during World War II

omeli [17]

I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate. An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.

On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews. The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism. The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way. Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.
On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan. The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation. They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war. And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively. (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)

So the matter can be argued from both sides. Pick your side and write a strong essay!

8 0

3 years ago

How did lessons learned from World War II influence President Truman’s decision to send troops to aid South Korea after North Ko

babymother [125]

One of the main ways in which lessons learned from World War II influence President Truman’s decision to send troops to aid South Korea after North Korea invaded was that World War II showed that inaction after a country violated the sovereign rights of another could lead to a prolonged conflict.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Based on the passage, what kind of government did the greek city-state have?

NARA [144]

Answer: Most of the city-states were monarchies ruled by a king. Some of the city-states were oligarchies ruled by the powerful elite members of society. Athens had a very special kind of government called democracy, which meant 'rule of the people. ' In Athenian democracy, people voted for the laws that they wanted.

8 0

2 years ago

Where did term bootlegger<br> come from

pickupchik [31]

The selling of unauthorized, uncertified, unstamped alcoholic drinks is referred to as bootlegging.

During the US's time of prohibition, many similar businesses arose.

The Southern regions of the nation were home to some of the most significant sites for the manufacture of spirits. Most notable were the numerous "stills" in the Appalachian mountain ranges, where it was quite simple to remain undetected by onlookers.

The "stills" were essentially home-built distilleries where whiskey was created from the region's abundant maize. It was combined with additional substances including yeast, sugar, water, and even meat.

Fermentation could take place because the materials were heated in metal vessels and the steam produced was directed via a coil of tubing. Then it was put into "jugs, or Mason jars."

It was a very basic whiskey, occasionally poisoning those who drank it. Bootleg was a phrase used to describe people who stowed their "flasks" inside the legs of their boots. As the phrase developed, it came to be used to describe those who produced and sold whiskey illegally.

6 0

2 years ago