All categories

3 years ago

What transformation rule would represent a shift of 3 units to the left 4 units down?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Llana [10]3 years ago

4 0

Given:

Shift of 3 units to the left 4 units down.

To find:

The transformation rule.

Solution:

The rule of transformation is

$(x,y)\to (x+a,y+b)$ ...(i)

Here, a<0 if the figure shifts a units left and a>0 if the figure shifts a units right.

Similarly, b<0 if the figure shifts b units down and b>0 if the figure shifts b units up.

If a transformation represents shift of 3 units to the left 4 units down, then a=-3 and b=-4.

Putting a=-3 and b=-4 (i), we get

$(x,y)\to (x+(-3),y+(-4))$

$(x,y)\to (x-3,y-4)$

Therefore, the correct option is B.

You might be interested in

What is 9/8 in simplest from

Alchen [17]

9/8 is in the simplest form

3 0

4 years ago

Write a question about a situation that has 24-x for the answer

NARA [144]

Answer:

A bottle holds 24 ounces of water. It has x ounces of water in it.

What does 24 - x represent in this situation?

4 0

3 years ago

Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

If their angles are the same, if they are proportional, if it states so

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't see the image you sent, but just naming different things that proves how triangles are similar.

4 0

3 years ago

An airplane takes 4 hours to travel a distance of 2600 miles with the wind. The return trip takes 5 hours against the wind. Find

tankabanditka [31]

2,600/4 =650
650•5 =3,250

I found the unit rate of the 2,600 by dividing the per hour and then times it by the 5 hours

Hopefully that was what you were looking for

3 0

3 years ago

Find the work done by F= (x^2+y)i + (y^2+x)j +(ze^z)k over the following path from (4,0,0) to (4,0,4)

babunello [35]

$\vec F(x,y,z)=(x^2+y)\,\vec\imath+(y^2+x)\,\vec\jmath+ze^z\,\vec k$

We want to find $f(x,y,z)$ such that $\nabla f=\vec F$ . This means

$\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}=x^2+y$

$\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}=y^2+x$

$\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial z}=ze^z$

Integrating both sides of the latter equation with respect to $z$ tells us

$f(x,y,z)=e^z(z-1)+g(x,y)$

and differentiating with respect to $x$ gives

$x^2+y=\dfrac{\partial g}{\partial x}$

Integrating both sides with respect to $x$ gives

$g(x,y)=\dfrac{x^3}3+xy+h(y)$

Then

$f(x,y,z)=e^z(z-1)+\dfrac{x^3}3+xy+h(y)$

and differentiating both sides with respect to $y$ gives

$y^2+x=x+\dfrac{\mathrm dh}{\mathrm dy}\implies\dfrac{\mathrm dh}{\mathrm dy}=y^2\implies h(y)=\dfrac{y^3}3+C$

So the scalar potential function is

$\boxed{f(x,y,z)=e^z(z-1)+\dfrac{x^3}3+xy+\dfrac{y^3}3+C}$

By the fundamental theorem of calculus, the work done by $\vec F$ along any path depends only on the endpoints of that path. In particular, the work done over the line segment (call it $L$ ) in part (a) is

$\displaystyle\int_L\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r=f(4,0,4)-f(4,0,0)=\boxed{1+3e^4}$

and $\vec F$ does the same amount of work over both of the other paths.

In part (b), I don't know what is meant by "df/dt for F"...

In part (c), you're asked to find the work over the 2 parts (call them $L_1$ and $L_2$ ) of the given path. Using the fundamental theorem makes this trivial:

$\displaystyle\int_{L_1}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r=f(0,0,0)-f(4,0,0)=-\frac{64}3$

$\displaystyle\int_{L_2}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r=f(4,0,4)-f(0,0,0)=\frac{67}3+3e^4$

8 0

3 years ago