1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kykrilka [37]
3 years ago
11

"Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It l

eaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
In a real sense nonviolence seeks to redeem the spiritual and moral lag that I spoke of earlier as the chief dilemma of modern man. It seeks to secure moral ends through moral means. Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. Indeed, it is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.”

–Martin Luther King Jr.,
Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1964

A) Identify ONE specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.

B) Explain ONE specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.

C) Explain ANOTHER specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.
History
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A) One specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he protested apartheid in South Africa by leading non-violent protests.

B) One specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he traveled India to protest the British rule peacefully. He advocated for the civil rights of Indians through speech and his travel.

C) Another specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that Gandhi led boycotts of British goods that acted as civil disobedience to protest peacefully.

Explanation:

Grace [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

~ make sure to paraphrase !

A) A specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela indicating that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he led non-violent protests against the apartheid in South Africa. Mandela and the fellow members of the African National Congress used non-violent tactics such as protests and strikes to protests the apartheid. This peaceful approach to the issues in South Africa indicate that Mandela would have agreed with and supported King's words such as how "violence is immoral" and how "nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon".

B) A specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi indicating he would have agreed with King's statement is that he protested against British rule and advocated or the Indian people peacefully. Gandhi adopted the term of "civil disobedience" and used it to describe his approach to non-violently refuse to cooperate with injustice. He protested against unjust laws, and supported labor strikes. He also organized mass non-violent marches. He also promoted the idea of non-violent protests and strikes to the people of India who were facing unjust norms in British-ruled India. He promoted various boycotts and strikes that were effective, yet mostly remained peaceful. By using this peaceful approach, he matches King's ideas of how peace and non-violence is just as powerful as using violent means.

C) An additional specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi indicating that he would have agreed with King's statement in the passage is how Gandhi boycotted against British goods in a peaceful manner. In addition to organizing and attending peaceful strikes against British rule, Gandhi also organized boycotts against British products. In March of 1930, Gandhi began his march in protest of the British monopoly of salt. This was one of his most defiant acts against British rule, yet he was still able to remain peaceful and non-violent. He promote the purchase of Indian goods as opposed to British products in order to help the local economies and hit a blow to the British. Through this effective yet passive demonstration, Gandhi was able to give meaning to King's words such as nonviolence is " a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding".

You might be interested in
Which of the following was NOT part of the New Deal? A.Social Security.
matrenka [14]

Answer:

D. Medicare is the correct answer.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Put the list of presidents in the correct order.
dusya [7]
John f kennedy 35th
lyndon b johnson 36th
richard nixon 37th
gerald ford 38th
jimmy carter 39th
ronald reagon 40th
george h bush 41st
bill clinton 42nd
6 0
4 years ago
4. What do you predict are the dangers of appeasement?
gavmur [86]
Good example of appeasement being used is the Munich Conference (1938), and the Potsdam Conference (1945). Many see appeasement as surrendering to another country’s wishes, which can make a nation and its leader look weak. It’s a temporary measure taken to stop a war, but many times is unsuccessful in the long run. Leaders such as Neville Chamberlain and FDR used this strategy with Hitler and Stalin, who both took advantage of what they had been given. Appeasement can put a country in a weak position due to them losing territory, resources, etc. It’s a very diplomatic policy, but usually only curbs a threat for a short time. Hope this helped a little! :)
5 0
3 years ago
Which best describes President Lincoln’s reaction to the formation of the Confederate States of America?
yuradex [85]
<span>He refused to accept the secession of states from the Union.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Essay about south africa transition to democracy
andrew11 [14]
If by South Africa you are referring to the Republic of South Africa, then their transition to Democracy was a bit rocky. It was a part of the British empire before they gained their independence as a free republic. This free republic however was not a democratic one due to things like apartheid rules where a minority of rich people who were mostly white controlled the government at the expense of the local African majority. As the fight for democracy continued many things started coming up like huge unemployment and infringement of human rights. Apartheid ended and currently the country is a democracy with suffrage, but there is evidence of high corruption among the government employees and the administration. Expand those ideas into an entire essay.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Countries sought new trade routes to avoid the chaos and high prices involved in the Mediterranean routes
    5·1 answer
  • Who would study Stonehenge for clues about the society that built it?
    12·1 answer
  • Who is the richest woman in the world
    15·1 answer
  • What is latin americans world leading producer of what 2 natrual resourecs?
    14·1 answer
  • Which items do historians study to learn about the past
    7·1 answer
  • What were the 3 major causes of WW1?
    14·2 answers
  • Do you think our modern idea of "downtown" is related to the idea of the Roman Forum? Why or why not?​
    7·1 answer
  • How many years separate the invention of the Gutenberg Printing Press (1450 CE) and the invention of the World Wide Web (1991 CE
    13·1 answer
  • What were the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did America's founders adopt constitutional democracy as the U.S. political system?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!