1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kykrilka [37]
3 years ago
11

"Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It l

eaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
In a real sense nonviolence seeks to redeem the spiritual and moral lag that I spoke of earlier as the chief dilemma of modern man. It seeks to secure moral ends through moral means. Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. Indeed, it is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.”

–Martin Luther King Jr.,
Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1964

A) Identify ONE specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.

B) Explain ONE specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.

C) Explain ANOTHER specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.
History
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A) One specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he protested apartheid in South Africa by leading non-violent protests.

B) One specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he traveled India to protest the British rule peacefully. He advocated for the civil rights of Indians through speech and his travel.

C) Another specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that Gandhi led boycotts of British goods that acted as civil disobedience to protest peacefully.

Explanation:

Grace [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

~ make sure to paraphrase !

A) A specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela indicating that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he led non-violent protests against the apartheid in South Africa. Mandela and the fellow members of the African National Congress used non-violent tactics such as protests and strikes to protests the apartheid. This peaceful approach to the issues in South Africa indicate that Mandela would have agreed with and supported King's words such as how "violence is immoral" and how "nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon".

B) A specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi indicating he would have agreed with King's statement is that he protested against British rule and advocated or the Indian people peacefully. Gandhi adopted the term of "civil disobedience" and used it to describe his approach to non-violently refuse to cooperate with injustice. He protested against unjust laws, and supported labor strikes. He also organized mass non-violent marches. He also promoted the idea of non-violent protests and strikes to the people of India who were facing unjust norms in British-ruled India. He promoted various boycotts and strikes that were effective, yet mostly remained peaceful. By using this peaceful approach, he matches King's ideas of how peace and non-violence is just as powerful as using violent means.

C) An additional specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi indicating that he would have agreed with King's statement in the passage is how Gandhi boycotted against British goods in a peaceful manner. In addition to organizing and attending peaceful strikes against British rule, Gandhi also organized boycotts against British products. In March of 1930, Gandhi began his march in protest of the British monopoly of salt. This was one of his most defiant acts against British rule, yet he was still able to remain peaceful and non-violent. He promote the purchase of Indian goods as opposed to British products in order to help the local economies and hit a blow to the British. Through this effective yet passive demonstration, Gandhi was able to give meaning to King's words such as nonviolence is " a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding".

You might be interested in
What is the man with the barrel trying to do?
elena-s [515]
Run away from that turtle
5 0
3 years ago
Can someone sum up the Arab Spring? Perhaps you could answer...
mina [271]
The Arab Springs was basically a series of uprisings across the Middle East which had started because people were not happy with life socially, economically, and politically. People in the Middle East were hit with high rates of unemployment, were skeptic of the effectiveness/legitimacy of their dictating rulers, economic hardship, etc. There are many factors that contributed to its failure but one factor that stood out to me the most was the fact that this “revolution” lacked a leader. Winning a revolt without a leader is next to impossible. A leader poses as an inspirational figure that can motivate those fighting toward greater accomplishments. What can you do without that?
3 0
4 years ago
What is a monarchy definition
Kipish [7]

Answer:

a form of government with a monarch as the head.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 3 reform movements that came out of the Second Great Awakening.
romanna [79]

Answer:

In antebellum America, a religious revival called the Second Great Awakening resulted in thousands of conversions to evangelical religions. Itinerant preachers, such as Charles Granison Finney, traveled from town to town, lecturing to crowds about eradicating sin in the name of perfectionism. Camp meetings, or large religious gatherings, also gave the devout opportunities to practice their religion and for potential conversions of non-believers. In addition to a religious movement, other reform movements such as temperance, abolition, and women's rights also grew in antebellum America. The temperance movement encouraged people to abstain from consuming alcoholic drinks in order to preserve family order. The abolition movement fought to abolish slavery in the United States. The women's rights movement grew from female abolitionists who realized that they too could fight for their own political rights. In addition to these causes, reforms touched nearly every aspect of daily life, such as restricting the use of tobacco and dietary and dress reforms.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement is supported by Karl Marx
Irina18 [472]
The answer is; industrilisation benefits the wealthy and exploits the poor. 

<em>Hope this helped and Happy New Year! :)</em>
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement BEST explains why Reconstruction ended?
    13·2 answers
  • What had greatest impact on the growth of schools in the late 1800s and early 1900s?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Napoleon’s military background shape his perspective?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was Carnegie Steel considered a vertical monopoly?
    9·1 answer
  • Which percentage of the United State's population lives in the Midwest?
    5·1 answer
  • Southern Christian Leadership Conference created by MLK to combat segregation v. Civil Rights Act of 1964 c. ... The African Ame
    15·1 answer
  • What did people who agreed with Alexander Hamilton believe about the government?
    13·2 answers
  • Did lewis and clark know about the north american bison before their journey
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe Count Camillo de Cavour?
    14·2 answers
  • What body of water was an important travel route for the European crusaders ?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!