1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kykrilka [37]
3 years ago
11

"Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It l

eaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
In a real sense nonviolence seeks to redeem the spiritual and moral lag that I spoke of earlier as the chief dilemma of modern man. It seeks to secure moral ends through moral means. Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. Indeed, it is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.”

–Martin Luther King Jr.,
Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1964

A) Identify ONE specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.

B) Explain ONE specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.

C) Explain ANOTHER specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement.
History
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A) One specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he protested apartheid in South Africa by leading non-violent protests.

B) One specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he traveled India to protest the British rule peacefully. He advocated for the civil rights of Indians through speech and his travel.

C) Another specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi that indicates that he would have agreed with King's statement is that Gandhi led boycotts of British goods that acted as civil disobedience to protest peacefully.

Explanation:

Grace [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

~ make sure to paraphrase !

A) A specific example from the life of Nelson Mandela indicating that he would have agreed with King's statement is that he led non-violent protests against the apartheid in South Africa. Mandela and the fellow members of the African National Congress used non-violent tactics such as protests and strikes to protests the apartheid. This peaceful approach to the issues in South Africa indicate that Mandela would have agreed with and supported King's words such as how "violence is immoral" and how "nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon".

B) A specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi indicating he would have agreed with King's statement is that he protested against British rule and advocated or the Indian people peacefully. Gandhi adopted the term of "civil disobedience" and used it to describe his approach to non-violently refuse to cooperate with injustice. He protested against unjust laws, and supported labor strikes. He also organized mass non-violent marches. He also promoted the idea of non-violent protests and strikes to the people of India who were facing unjust norms in British-ruled India. He promoted various boycotts and strikes that were effective, yet mostly remained peaceful. By using this peaceful approach, he matches King's ideas of how peace and non-violence is just as powerful as using violent means.

C) An additional specific example from the life of Mahatma Gandhi indicating that he would have agreed with King's statement in the passage is how Gandhi boycotted against British goods in a peaceful manner. In addition to organizing and attending peaceful strikes against British rule, Gandhi also organized boycotts against British products. In March of 1930, Gandhi began his march in protest of the British monopoly of salt. This was one of his most defiant acts against British rule, yet he was still able to remain peaceful and non-violent. He promote the purchase of Indian goods as opposed to British products in order to help the local economies and hit a blow to the British. Through this effective yet passive demonstration, Gandhi was able to give meaning to King's words such as nonviolence is " a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding".

You might be interested in
Use the timeline below to answer the following question.
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

B is "left" of 7000BCE so it must be an event earlier than that.

Only choice that was earlier is People in Peru weave grass into nets and baskets, 8000 BCE.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The October (Yom Kippur) War involved all but what?
svet-max [94.6K]
<span>The Yom Kippur War, Ramadan War, or October War, also known as the 1973 Arab–Israeli War, was a war fought by the coalition of Arab states led by Egypt and Syria against Israel from October 6 to 25, 1973. The fighting mostly took place in the Sinai and the Golan Heights, territories that had been occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War of 1967. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat wanted also to reopen the Suez Canal. Neither specifically planned to destroy Israel, although the Israeli leaders could not be sure of that.










Im not sure but hope that helped
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who believed pursuing money led to happiness
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

JP Morgan, Andrew Carnige, or John D. Rockefell

Explanation:

The Search For Happiness According to a study conducted by San Francisco State University, money does influence one's happiness. However, the money is being spent on experiences rather than actual items.

Please mark as brainliest

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements best explains why many northern states did not use slaves? Select one: a. Northern states were
Rama09 [41]
C. People in northern states could simply not afford to own slaves. This was because they were poorer than the southern states.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
While freedom speech is protected by the bill of rights, why are certain speech acts are still illegal such as yelling “fire” in
Vilka [71]

Answer:

it's obvious...the supreme court nation? u know

Explanation:

Even if the endangerment is the crime, the only act causing the endangerment is the shouting. Consider the question "If you pull a trigger and cause a bullet to fly through the air and kill someone then wouldn't the killing be the crime?" Yet still we might speak about whether this or that defense might be helpful to the shooter even though the charge is murder rather than "shooting."

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1800’s, thousands of people settled throughout the western region of United States and British Columbia. Boomtowns quickl
    7·1 answer
  • What significant event happened to the state economy in the early 1980s?
    7·2 answers
  • Which aroused the greatest controversy in the u.s. at the end of the spanish-american war?
    7·1 answer
  • Members of the National Assembly, when locked out of the Estates-General gathered and demanded a constitution under the
    11·1 answer
  • As regulated by the 1990 clean air act, industries that put more acid-forming pollutants into the air are subject to a fine. tru
    5·2 answers
  • How did Boris Yeltsin respond to the Communist coup attempt?
    13·2 answers
  • What country entering the NATO alliance sparked the creation of the Warsaw Pact
    9·2 answers
  • Ang dinastiyang tang ay tinaguriang golden age of china tama o mali?​
    10·1 answer
  • ANSWER NOW! How has the war in Ukraine affected farmers in the US?
    10·2 answers
  • For which of the following reasons were the Federalist Papers written?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!