Answer: Financial reforms were crucial to the New Deal and ending the Depression. The Securities Act of 1933 was passed to attempt to regulate Wall Street and lessen fraudulent activities with securities in the hopes of avoiding another stock market crash.
Explanation: Financial reforms were crucial to the New Deal and ending the Depression. The Securities Act of 1933 was passed to attempt to regulate Wall Street and lessen fraudulent activities with securities in the hopes of avoiding another stock market crash. The Banking Act of 1933, meanwhile, was further implementing banking regulations, this time invoking separation of investment banking and commercial banking and creating the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as part of the Glass-Steagall Act.
Answer:
That statement is true
Explanation:
We have both short-term and long-term memory.
Short-term Memory allows one to apply knowledge to a specific task , while Long-term memory allows one to store and recall information.
Short term memory only capable in holding small amount of information. When short term memory is used with association with working memory, It become the force that help us in our reasoning /decision making process and make us able to apply knowledge in specific task that we experienced beforehand.
Long-term memory on the other hand, is capable in holding large amount of information. The information that is stored in the long-term memory tend to be harder to forget and can only be stored if we keep encountering that data over and over again. It stored all important information that needed by short-term/working memory to do its function.
They were taught that satans weakest individuals (women, children, elderly) were easiest to be manipulated so women were perceived sinful and wicked.
Area with a set if common features and characteristics
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
