1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dedylja [7]
3 years ago
13

Im giving out free brainlist i need help

History
1 answer:
dimaraw [331]3 years ago
5 0
B is the answer hope this helps
You might be interested in
What is NOT the function of political parties? A: Selecting the candidate B: calling for a recount C: conducting the campaign D:
Irina18 [472]
<span>What is NOT the function of political parties? Out of the four choices it's D designing the platform. This is the case because political parties do not design the platform the platform is already in place and has been used for many political races.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Any Advertising Slogans for Constantinople??
Crazy boy [7]

The best place with the right church for you.

7 0
4 years ago
Role if land companies in yazoo land fraud
WARRIOR [948]
You may want to reword your answer. I did not understand the way you phrased it. Apologies. :l
4 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
Giuseppe garibaldi united small independent states in which region?
ehidna [41]
The correct answer is Italy 

Italy was divided into smaller city states that governed themselves and the area around them. Such states were places like Florence or Venice or Rome or similar. Garibaldi was a key figure in the unification of these states under the Italian banner since they all shared the same language and common history and they became a single country.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mahavira was the founder of what Indian religion?
    9·2 answers
  • In what way was the mayflower compact important to the development of democracy in america? (8.2.1)
    12·1 answer
  • When was the first world war happened??
    5·2 answers
  • What arguments does Washington use to support his statement that the government is the “main pillar” of independence? Why does h
    9·1 answer
  • PLZ HURRY!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • 6. What were some key ideas of black power?
    8·1 answer
  • How does the Bill of Rights protect individuals' civil liberties?
    7·1 answer
  • What was one method Indira Gandhi used to improve conditions in India?
    6·1 answer
  • How is socialism similar to capitalism?
    10·2 answers
  • NEED ANSWER ASAP BE DETAILED PLEASE
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!