On August 4, 1735, John Peter Zenger is brought to trial. In a surprise move, his supporters hire a brilliant lawyer from Philadelphia to defend him. Andrew Hamilton argues in court that Zenger should not be found guilty of seditious libel<span> because the Journal's criticisms of Cosby's government were true.</span>
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
The excerpt reflects the viewpoint of Federalists.
The above appreciations can be found in Alexander Hamilton text "The utility of the union as a safeguard against domestic faction and insurrection." In it, the idea of the Confederate Republic defined by Hamilton as an <em>assemblage of societies</em> is characterized. It defines the extension up to which democracy should operate.
Thus, the ideas in the excerpt are also, some of the ones that constitute what Hamilton referred to as the <em>science of politics and representation</em>, which contained elements that categorized an innovative government as the US is.
Economic issues in many countries: Greece and Turkey in particular were struggling and the US and USSR as positioning for control.
In the aftermath of WWII, many countries in Europe were left economically devastated. The US employed the Marshall Plan to fund and secure the economies of many countries including Greece (shown on the map). Stalin was next to make a move to secure countries under his influence.
Answer: pretty sure it’s Iwo Jima
Explanation:
If not I’m so sorry
