Answer:
The excerpts which show that Queen Elizabeth's response to the Parliament's request was rhetoric are:
1. The realm shall not remain destitute of any heir that may be a fit governor, and peradventure more beneficial to the realm.
2. For though I be never so careful of your well-doing, and mind ever so to be, yet may my issue grow out of kind, and become perhaps ungracious.
Explanation:
Queen Elizabeth responded to the parliament quite persuasively. She appeals using logos to persuade the audience and make her point clear to them. She convinces them that she is capable enough to rule alone. She appeals them to give her strength.
She said that Parliament should not worry that she is not married or doesn't have any child. Having one doesn't guarantee that the heir would be competent enough to rule. She is herself quite capable to rule effectively and is a capable leader.
Answer:
C. The Age of Discovery saw an increase in ocean travel, which allowed churches to send representatives to distant lands to spread Christianity.
Explanation:
The Age of Discovery is also known as Age of Exploration and it refers to an early period between the 15th century and 17th century in Europe. It was a period that was typically characterized by sea-faring by European countries such as Portugal and Spain to explore various geographical regions around the world.
The Age of Discovery is notably and famously known for exploration through sea-faring (ocean travel) and it led to the discovery of the New World (America), as well as other unknown geographical locations.
Some prominent examples include the Columbian Exchange, the transatlantic exploration (voyage) by Christopher Columbus, Portuguese discoveries (Azores and Archipelagos of Madeira), etc., across the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans.
Hence, the relationship between the Age of Discovery and Christianity was that the Age of Discovery saw an increase in ocean travel, which allowed churches to send representatives to distant lands to spread Christianity.
Is there a passage, or any options?
Answer:
The role of the state in our lifestyles, most people believe, is the secret to a healthy life. While some should claim that eating whatever we choose is independence of selection Based on the perspective of sight, nevertheless, the function of the state in influencing what we eat is either a forced intrusion or a brazen intervention with the free will of Individuals.
While we receive a strong point for our diets being regulated by the country most evidence indicates that the administration's intervention with our nutrition has demonstrated little if any impact.
And of all the fat individuals in the nation with medical conditions, the most encouraging statement that individuals are in favour with the government regulating what we eat is the most encouraging one.
For decades, the central administration has told citizens what they can and should not bring in their bloodstream. If it's Tran's fat and nicotine, sugar or liquor, refined or sodium, so others believe they know best, politicians and authorities pick stuff off our plate.
All of the answers above are correct except:
<span>d. increased productivity
</span>
When long-term stress strikes, a person may feel the negative symptoms of the disorder which are evidenced by all of the three answers; whereas the last answer seems to be a positive effect.