What role did the Jesuit settlers play in colonializing Brazil?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Jlenok [28]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

In the two hundred years following their arrival in Brazil, the Jesuits monopolized indigenous labor and organized hugely productive agricultural endeavors, including cattle ranches and sugar and cotton plantations.

Explanation:

Hope this answer helps you :)

Have a great day

Mark brainliest

You might be interested in

Consider a wetland ecosystem similar to the one shown in the image below. In this ecosystem are two species: a small fish specie

harina [27]

If the local temperature changes in favor of greater oxygen levels in the water, the population of the small fish species and the wading bird population would be changed and affected NEGATIVELY in response to the newly elevated oxygen levels over the next six months.

High levels of oxygen over an extended period of time would cause the fish to eventually become sick and to die. This would leave the wading bird species without nourishment for life and energy reproduction leading to the depletion of the bird species along with the small fish species.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A client recieves a presceription for disufiram to help maintain abstinence from alcohol. ehich information should the nurse inc

defon

Patients taking disulfiram require monitoring for signs and signs and symptoms of hepatitis, together with fatigue, weakness, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, jaundice, malaise, and dark urine.

Baseline and follow-up liver characteristic assessments ought to be monitored ten days to one month following initiation of disulfiram.

<h3>What are the aspect outcomes of disulfiram?</h3>

drowsiness, tiredness, headache, metallic or garlic-like style in the mouth, skin rash or acne, impotence, and. swollen or sore tongue.

<h3>What precautions are crucial when taking disulfiram?</h3>

Do now not use alcohol-containing meals such as sauces and vinegars. Before you take the first dose of this medicine, make positive you have now not taken any alcoholic beverage or alcohol-containing product or medicine (for example, tonics, elixirs, and cough syrups) at some stage in the previous 12 hours.

Learn more about disulfiram here:

<h3>brainly.com/question/14975741</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>

3 0

2 years ago

What is the best way to combat terrorism?

kicyunya [14]

Found this on the internet

....
Terrorism constitutes a real threat to democracy, the rule of law and the enjoyment of human rights. As such it must be countered through prevention and suppression by the member States of the Council of Europe. However, poorly implemented or overly Draconian counter-terrorism measures can be counterproductive. While law enforcement operations aimed at terrorists are necessary and justified, counter-terrorism measures should not go beyond what is necessary to maintain peace and security, nor should they subvert the rule of law and democracy in the cause of trying to save it.

5 0

3 years ago

Why did King Edward the third think he had the right to the French throne? And how did the people feel about this? (Hundred year

ryzh [129]

From the 1340s to the nineteenth century, barring two brief interims during the 1360s and the 1420s, the lords and rulers of England (and, later, of Great Britain) likewise guaranteed the position of the royalty of France. The case dates from Edward III, who guaranteed the French position of royalty in 1340 as the sororal nephew of the last immediate Capetian, Charles IV. Edward and his beneficiaries battled the Hundred Years' War to implement this case and were quickly fruitful during the 1420s under Henry V and Henry VI, yet the House of Valois, a cadet part of the Capetian tradition, was, at last, successful and held control of France. Regardless of this, English and British rulers proceeded to unmistakably call themselves rulers of France and the French fleur-de-lys were incorporated into the regal arms. This proceeded until 1801, by which time France never again had any ruler, having turned into a republic. The Jacobite petitioners, in any case, did not unequivocally surrender the case.

6 0

3 years ago

True or False: The Eastern Roman Empire lasted for 1,000 years longer than the Western Roman Empire.

Nastasia [14]

Answer: The Eastern Roman Empire lasted for 1,000 years longer than the Western Roman Empire:

TRUE!

Explanation: The eastern Roman empire known as the Byzantine Empire lasted 1,000 years more than the western Roman Empire because, In 330, Constantine I (Constantine the 1st) decided to make Constantinople the new seat of the Roman Empire; it could be said that this was the real starting date of the Byzantine Empire. While the Western Roman Empire crumbled and fell by 476, the Byzantine one flourished and lasted until 1453 when Constantinople was finally taken by the Ottomans.

8 0

3 years ago