Answer:
The correct answer is Partial presentation.
Explanation:
Having the minimum presentation guidelines, the financial statements may be converted to basic statements or otherwise adapted to certain guidelines. The presentation is considered partial if it does not take into account one of the following items: (1) gross sales or income, (2) gross profit or cost of sales, (3) unusual or infrequent items, (4) provision for income taxes, (5) discontinued operations or extraordinary items, (6) income from continuing operations, (7) net income, (8) basic and diluted earnings per share, (9) significant changes in financial position.
Answer:
A) Oversubscribed
Explanation:
An IPO is described as oversubscribed when the demand for the shares on offer exceeds the stock available. The interest in the IPO by investors is very high that the shares on offer cannot meet the demand. The degree of the over-subscription is expressed by a multiple. For example, Company XYZ shares are oversubscribed two times.
An oversubscribed share will often transact at a higher price when trading begins. A company whose shares have been oversubscribed can take advantage and offer more shares. Over-subscription contrasts under-subscription, which is a situation of low demand for an IPO that results in some shares not being bought.
They should understand when they need professional advice, they need to get it. Let the small business owner hire a tax accountant, lawyer, and subscribe to a debt collection service. (<span>Kevin k)</span>
Answer: option C
Explanation: THIS CAN BE REPRESENTED AS FOLLOWS :-
If we eliminate the product there would be no sales, no variable expenses and therefore, no contribution.
sales = nil
-variable expenses= <u>nil</u>
contribution = nil
- fixed expenses = <u>56,000</u>
NET LOSS = <u> (56000)</u>
.
NOTE :-
Fixed expense = (140,000)*(40%)= 56,000
.
.
Thus increase in loss would be 56000- 50,000=6000
Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
