Answer:
Autocratic
Explanation:
In autocratic leadership, the manager or leader makes all decisions on behalf of the company or group. The leader does not seek or consider the inputs of others when making decisions. The autocratic leadership style is the same as the dictatorship style.
An autocratic leader issues orders or commands which the subordinates are expected to follow to the latter. When the organization archives success, all the credit goes to the leader.
We can actually deduce here that when building the Complete 2nd Order Model, one can do all except: C. Create an interaction between age and each of the levels of job satisfaction.
<h3>What is Complete Second Order Model?</h3>
The complete second degree (order) model is actually known to be a polynomial model that includes the linear terms, second degree terms and the interaction term.
The options that complete the question are:
A. Create a curvilinear term for job satisfaction
B. Create an interaction between unemployment rate and age
C. Create an interaction between age and each of the levels of job satisfaction
D. Create a curvilinear term for age.
Thus, options C is the one that wouldn't be carried out in the Complete Second Order Model.
Learn more about Human Resources on brainly.com/question/25443563
#SPJ11
<span>He encourages his R&D department to develop innovative products and focuses on being quick to respond to market changes. technology sales has an </span>adhocracy culture.
Hope this helps !
Photon
Answer:
The journal entry to record the bond issuance is shown below:
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the bond issuance is as:
Cash A/c.............................................Dr $420,000
Bonds Payable A/c......................Cr $420,000
Being the bonds issued
As the bonds are issued by the company so cash is coming into the business, which is an asset and any increase in asset is debited. Therefore, the cash account is debited. And cash is received against the bonds payable, so the account of bonds payable is credited.
Answer:
The <em>covenant of good faith and fair dealing</em> simply requires all the parties to a contract to deal in an even-handed manner such that one party's action does not frustrate the other or prevent the other from getting the benefits of that contract.
In insurance, this covenant is sometimes captured under the heading <em>Uberrima fides</em>. This is a Latin phrase meaning <em>"Utmost Good Faith".</em>
In insurance, this covenant is legally binding on all parties to ensure they each reveal every information that is material to the acceptance or rejection of the risk (on the part of the Insurer) whilst on the part of the Insured the insurer is required to be explicit regarding the terms of the policy as well as the calculations by which the premium is arrived at.
For example, if an Insurance company is looking at covering someone under it's Life Insurance Policy, the person taking out the contract must disclose whether or not the Insured has any latent health issues which might shorten their lifespan. If there is such a condition, the Insurance company may still take on the risk albeit at a relatively higher rate than a client without such medical conditions.
An Insurance Company may breach this covenant if they delay or refuse to reasonable settle claims due to the Insured. It may also arise if the Insurance company by some technical manipulation intentionally under settles an Insurance claim.
If for instance, a Comprehensive Insurance Policy files a valid claim, the Insurer may be liable for negligence and or intentional wrongdoing.
Cheers!
