Answer:
Q1 True
Q2 More volatile
Q3 Pherk, Airing, Goohoo, Shexxon
Explanation:
Q1 The reason is that the greater the number of stock in the portfolio the lower is the unsystematic risk associated with the investment because the investor receives an average portfolio of investment.
Q2 The greater are the number of the investments in different stocks the lower are the chances of vulnerability. This means that Portfolio A consist lower number of investments than portfolio B in different companies which means that the return on the portfolio A will be more volatile than portfolio B.
Q3 The investments in different industries is more diversified than the investment made in similar industry. The Pherk, Airing, Goohoo and Shexxon are four different industries which means that the investment in such companies is more diversified than other investments in similar industries.
Answer:
economic profits = 0
so correct option is a)zero
Explanation:
given data
output = 100 units
total fixed cost = $600
total variable cost = $400
price of product = $10 per unit
firm produces = 100 unit
to find out
firm earn an economic profit of Group
solution
we know here Total revenue is
Total revenue = 10 × 100 =$1000
and Total cost is here
Total cost = $400 + $600
Total cost = $1,000
so economic profits is express as
economic profits = revenue - cost
economic profits = 1000 - 1000
economic profits = 0
so correct option is a)zero
The two measures which can be used by Nando’s to assess environmental turbulence within the macro-environment are predictability and changeability.
<h3>What is an
environmental turbulence?</h3>
An environmental turbulence can be defined as a measure of the rate and unpredictability of changes that occurs in a business firm's external environment.
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that the two (2) measures which can be used by Nando’s to assess environmental turbulence within the macro-environment are predictability and changeability.
Read more on environmental turbulence here: brainly.com/question/20377406
#SPJ1
Suppose the government launches a successful advertising campaign that convinces workers with high school degrees to quit their jobs and become full time college students. This would cause the labor force participation rate to decrease.
Let's imagine that the government employs a convincing advertising campaign to persuade those with high school diplomas to quit their jobs and devote their full time to attending college. As a result, the rate of labor force participation would decrease.
The labor force participation rate provides an estimate of the size of the labor force in an economy. The percentage of the working-age, non-institutionalized population, aged 16 and over, that is employed or actively seeking employment is used in the calculation. When paired with the unemployment rates, it can help put the state of the economy in some sort of context.
To know more about labor force refer:
brainly.com/question/14826712
#SPJ4
