The Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand was visiting Serbia, which was an extremely controversial decision considering the relationship between the Austrians and the Serbians was very rough, as Serbia was then owned by the Austro-Hungarian empire, which caused civil unrest in Serbia. While Ferdinand was driving down the street to visit families who were victims of a horrible bombing that was actually an attempted assassination on Ferdinand himself, Gavrilo Princip, shot him and his wife. As a result, the Austro-Hungarian Empire devised a list of policies that really served to ruin the Serbian economy, as well as put Serbia in as unstable a condition as possible. Russia, who at the time was a very strong ally of Serbia, then mobilized its army because of Austria's then reaction to the assassination of Ferdinand. Germany then allies with the Austrio-Hungarian Empire, signified by the "blank check" Kaiser Wilhelm II gives to the Austrians, authorizing any decision the Austrians decide to make regarding the Balkan Crisis. Because France was allies with Russia at the time, and the Franco Prussian War destroyed the relations between France and Germany, Germany declared war on France, who immediately responded by forging an alliance with both Great Britain and Russia.
Frequent leadership changes in the government destabilized the relationship between England and the colonies.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
When George III came in power in the year 1760, he had succeeded the throne of his grand father who was George II. When George III came to the throne, there had been some changes in the government and since every government had it's own policies which were made to govern the country.
The change of the policies resulted in the destabilizing of the economy and few years of his rule were of instability and therefore it had a negative affect on the trade relation ship between England and the colonies of England.
Nothing. The only activity that is forbidden under national socialism is organizing against the government. Otherwise, he is free to engage in any activity that is legal in a liberal democratic nation. However, there are strict restrictions on personal behavior in communist nations. Nothing can be produced by someone and sold to someone else. Not even a bake sale, a piece of art, a book, or some boots. Nothing one produces may be sold or claimed as their own. Nothing is yours to keep personally. The elite of the communist party, which controls the government, owns everything and lives like kings without a care in the world, while the average person only has access to the barest necessities like free, subpar healthcare, education, and housing. There were severe famines that claimed tens of millions of lives in communist China and the Soviet Union. In communist nations, the government owns all industry, such as it is, and decides where and how people will work. They are only given restricted freedom of movement inside the nation and are not permitted to exit it. They are impassed. Additionally, the government mandates that everyone adopt the beliefs that the Marxist party and its philosophy reject. no commitment to any religion or unconventional political or social ideologies. Never, dude. For this reason, the CIA was so dedicated to eliminating communists throughout the Cold War wherever they might be found. In the Middle East, Vietnam, Indonesia, South America, etc. They might have had a point when they said that the only decent communist was a dead one. National Socialism was considered positively by the CIA personnel I met who were active in the 1950s as a socialist alternative that might stop the spread of communism in third-world nations where old oligarchies very well assured that communist revolutions would succeed. The CIA backed Saddam Hussein and his Ba'ath party when I worked in Iraq because it was a socialist and anti-Islamist movement that might stop the communists from gaining control. Nazi spies established the Ba'ath of Iraq in the 1930s. Nazi type parties and movements and governments were from time to time supported by the CIA in many places.
Answer:
The Root-Takahira Agreement, is the right answer.
Explanation:
An agreement negotiated between Elihu Root, the U.S. Secretary of State and Takahira Kogorō, the Japanese Ambassador to the U.S. is known as the Root–Takahira Agreement. This agreement was signed on 30th November 1908. This was an agreement which was signed to prevent the possibilities of future war by mutually acknowledging some international policies and spheres of control in the Pacific.
It developed from Vedic texts and ideas from other cultures.
