Answer:
1). Two things to wear - <u>SHIRT, SKIRT</u>
2).Two grains - <u>WHEAT, MAIZE</u>
3).TWO transport - <u>TRAIN, PLANE</u>
Explanation:
As per the given letters, the two clothes' names would be 'shirt' and 'skirt' while the name of two grains that can be formed would be 'wheat' and 'maize' and the transports would be 'train' and 'plane.' <u>The rearrangement of letters is an effective technique that allows the students to make meaningful words, practice them, and remember them effectively</u>. Thus, it promotes the development of vocabulary and grammatical knowledge. It also enhances the logical ability of the students.
Answer:
Belgium wouldn't allow Germany passage through their territory.
Belgium wanted to remain neutral to both sides and allowing Germans passage to France was not remaining neutral to France.
Germany invaded France because they had declared war on them but when invading Belgium to get into France, they broke the treaty of London which is why Great Britain entered the war.
France was allied with Russia which is why Germany declared war against them. Hitler wanted to rule Russia and expand its empire, since France sided with Russia to defeat the expansion, Germany called for a war against them, thus pulling France into WW2.
Hope this helps!
I believe it is “there is a path out of suffering”because,Buddhist made the eightfold path to get away from suffering.
Before embarking on the series of court cases that argued for his freedom, Scott’s life was the rootless existence typical of many slaves. Born around 1799 in Virginia, he moved with his owner Peter Blow to Alabama and eventually to St. Louis, where he was sold to U.S. Army Dr. John Emerson in the early 1830s.
Like many antebellum officers, Emerson was transferred from post to post through Western states and territories. During those journeys, Scott married a slave woman named Harriet Robinson in 1836. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott, by then the father of two children, likely hoped the doctor’s will would manumit him—and his family—but it did not. Scott then offered Emerson’s brother-in-law and executor, J.A. Sanford, $300 hoping to buy his own freedom. But the offer was turned down. Scott decided to take the matter to the courts.
By 1846, Scott was living in St. Louis in service to Emerson’s widow. He filed suit with the state of Missouri, claiming that since he had lived with Emerson in Illinois—where slavery was outlawed by the 1787 Northwest Ordinance—and Fort Snelling in Minnesota—where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in 1820—he was entitled to his freedom. In an interesting twist, the children of Peter Blow, Scott’s first owner, provided the slave family financial assistance.
