Answer:
$1,000,000
Explanation:
The computation of the Capital Projects Fund liability for the note is shown below:
= Issued price
= $1,000,000
The time period should be ignored. As the question has asked about the Capital Projects Fund liability , so we consider only the amount i.e $1,000,000 without considering its time period, and the dates which are mentioned in the question.
Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Answer:
prices to fall according to the classical economists and unemployment to increase according to Keynes.
Explanation:
The classical economists believes that a decrease in aggregate demand for goods produced would being about fall in the prices of such goods. What this implies is that as more goods are produced, if such production is not backed by corresponding demand by consumers, the prices of such goods produced will eventually fall because supply is greater than demand.
For the Keynes, their argument is that a decrease in aggregate demand will cause unemployment to increase. This is because owners of businesses or employers would lay off their employees when goods produced exceeds the demand for such production by consumers. Here, owners of businesses pays their employees through sales of goods produced. So, when the goods produced are not purchased, then there will be excess availability of such goods; hence no sale or profit, from which salaries would be paid. The next step is to start laying off employees because employers cannot cover their running costs.
Answer:
A. A claim by the employee will probably be based on promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Promissory estoppel doctrine refers to trying to enforce a promise. In other words, a person that makes a promise is responsible for performing it as long as:
- the promissor made a promise and the promisee acted because of it
- the promisee relied on the promise
- the promisee suffers a loss due to the unfulfilled promise
B. Raising or lowering interest rates and controlling the money supply.