There are hardly any
It's mostly side effects such as mild fevers and stuff, but vaccines are a must
The correct option is C
The nineteenth century represents a turning point for the history of China and Japan with the arrival of Western powers in Pacific waters. Although the circumstances of both countries were very different, figuratively we could say that in the second half of the nineteenth century China lost the train of modernity due to its slow economic growth while Japan climbed quickly to the development plane.
Japan and contact with the West; At first they had had contact with some merchants from Holland, Russia and Great Britain. It was not until 1853-1854 with the Kangawa Treaty, and the US imposition. Through the military Matther Perry, that Japan opened its ports with commercial sights. All this caused a crisis in their traditional feudal structures, and a population that felt humiliated.
Outlawed slavery in the territory
Edict of Nantes
It was issued in 1598, by king Henry IV Bourbon of France. It was the second document (after The January Edict of 1561) issued by a French sovereign to provide religious freedom in the country. It was a consequence of the long-lasting religious conflicts in France between Catholics and Huguenots (other name for Calvinists), situated mainly in Southern France. King Henry IV succeeded Henry III Valois and his infamous mother Catherine de Medici. Henry IV was one of the most prominent leaders of the Protestant opposition in France, but had to convert to Catholicism (for the second time in his life) in order to inherit the throne. The Edict of Nantes was one of the first things that he did as a king, and, basically, it allowed for the Protestants across the land to hold on to the cities that they had turned into their strongholds, while Catholics did the same, too. This was a compromise and angered many, Catholics because they could not get rid of the "heresy" among their lands, and Protestants because they could not succeed in reforming France once and for all.
Answer:
It was very realistic
Explanation:
So the movie was based on the flight that occured on 9/11, and the flight wsa United 93. I'm not really sure of all the details of the real event, but I did see a lot of truths. One thing that stood out to me was a conspiracy that had been floating around for awhile.
So there were orders to shoot the plane down to prevent it from flying into the White House, but the plane "crashed" into the field.
Here's the thing, with this big situation, don't you think that if fighter piltowere given orders to shoot down a plane that was heading for the White HOuse, they would have done it. They say that passengers on the plane overtook the coockpit, but in my opinion, I think it was shot down. It makes sense.
Hope this helps!!