Answer:
Explanation:
Certain laws made it hard for immigrants to do many things. They were discriminated in many ways as well. People made it to where immigrants couldn’t live, eat, play, go to work and school in the same place as others. They did all of this because of the way someone looked, or if they could speak english or not.
Answer:
The Great Society ideals seemed inconsistent with the escalating war in Vietnam
Explanation:
Political Leaders on the left are primarily Doves (Anti-War/Pro-Peace) so, if you are esclating a war in Vietnam to gain the rights for freedoms of people in Saigon while an African American still has to pay a poll tax to vote how can you reconcile the two?
Many Mesopotamian states engaged in warfare mainly because "<span>a. They needed to gain access to raw materials through force", since these materials were limited in nature.</span>
It is hard to say without looking at your source (textbook or article if you have one associated with this question) but in the most recent studies, it has been Islam.
According to Jefferson himself, you could divide man in two kinds:
1) Those who did not trust people or feared them. Those people, supposedly, wished to prevent them from having powers by giving that power to a specific class that would hold the responsibility of watching over the people and the nation.
2) Those who are confident in the people and their individual liberties and consider them mostly honest and good people. In that case, there would be no need to give great powers to a higher class. In fact, that would be counterproductive to their ideals.
You will find those two lines of thinking in pretty much every country and every culture. They are considered often as Left or Right, Progressive or Conservative, Liberal or Socialist and so on.
That showed up quickly in the USA since when the Whigs party emerged, it did as opposition to the Democrat Party. Showing an early duality from the beginning of the American Democracy. And even if you have a multiparty system like other countries, you can easily find them dividing generally in two sides that internally agree with MOST issues but disagree fundamentally in many with the opposition.
