Answer:
What's wrong
Explanation:
l hope you get better
we all are in this together!
The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.
The explanation of how Santiago's physical characteristics help the reader to better understand the old man is
- His neck is wrinkled from the sun. This shows that he has been out at sea under the sun for too long.
- His hands bear the scars of many fishing battles. This shows that he is an experienced fisherman
- He has blue eyes. This indicates that he is a good-looking man.
<h3>What is Characterization?</h3>
This refers to the role of a character that shows what he is supposed to do in a play and the way a character is described either directly or indirectly
Hence, we can see that based on the details in the book, the physical characteristics of Santiago, the old fisherman are shown and the inferences that can be made about him are listed above.
Read more about Old Man and the Sea here:
brainly.com/question/27818424
#SPJ1
The following are the compromise made before the Compromise of 1850:• The Missouri Compromise: Missouri was admitted into the Union as a slave state. However, Maine was taken away from Massachusetts and made into a non-slave state. It was done to balance out the number of slaves and non-slave states in the US.• Slave Trade Compromise: Slavery went for 20 years because of this compromise.• Connecticut Compromise: The Constitution set up two houses in Congress: the House of Representatives (proportional membership based on population) and the Senate (two seats per state). • The Three-Fifths Compromise: Slaves counted as 3/5 of a person under the Constitution for apportioning House of Representative seats.
It had brought racial discrimination to prosper for slave states. For Non-slave states. The Northerners were able to grow economically. They had railroads and had established industrialized states.
I am positive the answer is the second choice
Let me know if i am wrong and ill correct it
