maybe assessing all possible outcomes or observe
Answer:
The correct answer is C)
Explanation:
To Alice, the entire trial was a sham. There was a Jury (of which the Lizard was a member) that was incapable of reading. If this was so, how could they evaluate any evidence that spoke to her credit or demerit?
For in the same Chapter 7, a letter or a collection of verses was read which according to the Queen was a piece of evidence against Alice. The Jury, even upon the challenge to do so by Alice, could not interpret the same.
Cheers!
C by making your argument more credible; avoiding logical fallacies means you want to avoid logical misunderstandings basically.
Answer:
squint your eyes.. thats what i do.. or just eat carrots all day
Explanation:
