Answer:
A
Explanation:
None of the other options make sense, they consist of the causes of the strikes. The only reason they did it was to get better conditions at work (pay).
While the U.S. had little interest in Europe, it did have a
large economic interest in Latin America and a growing one in East Asia. The
U.S. was even more prone to expansion in Latin America. There were larger
economic interests and a strategic importance of obtainable regions.
Answer:
it provided there crops with water and there villages with water for there animals and crops
Both the Southern and Middle Colonies had fertile farmlands, but only the Middle Colonies was able to provide trading opportunities, thanks to their coastal lowland and bay-provided harbors. Southern Colonies highly contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo. Slaves cultivate huge tracts of land and plantations owned by wealthy aristocrats and large landowners. On the other hand, Middle Colonies were more suitable for growing grain and livestock, with its environment ideal for small to large farms. More diverse workforce also exists in the Middle Colonies, consisting of farmers, fisherman, and merchants. Another notable contrast between the two colonies is that, for the people of the South, life developed as rough and rural while people of the Middle countries are deeply connected to the Church and village community.
