Answer:
The Great Society ideals seemed inconsistent with the escalating war in Vietnam
Explanation:
Political Leaders on the left are primarily Doves (Anti-War/Pro-Peace) so, if you are esclating a war in Vietnam to gain the rights for freedoms of people in Saigon while an African American still has to pay a poll tax to vote how can you reconcile the two?
The defeat of the Spanish Armada was not a result of the English Civil War, as this happened in 1588 during the Anglo-Spanish War.
The English Civil War led to the trial and execution of Charles I, the exile of his son Charles II, and the replacement of the English monarchy by the Commonwealth of England (1649-1653) and then a protectorate (1653-1659) under the personal government of Oliver Cromwell. The monopoly of the Church of England on the Christian religion in England ended, and a new Protestant aristocracy settled in Ireland. A precedent was established regarding the government of a king, who can not command without the consent of the Parliament and its people.
One of Truman's most important policies was the Truman Doctrine.
The Truman Doctrine was a foreign policy of president Harry Truman in which he tried to stop the power/influence of the Soviet Union. After World War II, Truman was worried that if nations located near the Soviet Union did not receive financial help, they would fall into the hands of the communist system. At this time, Truman wanted to make sure that he stopped the spread of communism in any way possible.
To do this, Truman asked Congress to provide $400 million to countries like Greece and Turkey. These were two main targets of US help, as they were located close to the Soviet Union. Ultimately, this money would help to stabilize their economy and fend off communism.
Naïve citizens allow corrupt governments.
In literature, <u>situational irony</u> creates a contrast between what the readers might expect and what actually happens in the text. The goal is to shed light on the difference between appearances and the reality, with regard to a particular theme.
Here, the irony is that even though the farm produces more and gains more money, the animals who worked for this progress to happen are not getting the profits of this improvement. All the money goes to the hands of the ruling class (the pigs and the dogs), because the other animals are naïve enough to believe that the rulers' "supervision and organisation" work is enough to justify this unfair wealth distribution.
