Answer:
B. a comparative advantage in banana production
<u>Attached table with missing information:</u>
Explanation:
<em>Guatemala's economy opportunity cost:</em>
50 orange / 100 banana = 0.5 opportunity cost of bananas
100 orange /50 banana = 2 opportunity cost of orange
<em>Mexico's economy opportunity cost:</em>
200 orange /200 banana = 1 opportunity cost of bananas
200 banana /200 orange = 1 opportunity cost of orange
The opportunity cost for bananas (production of orange resigned) is lower in Guatemala than in Mexico's. Thus there is a comparative advantage.
Answer:
Product K1 = 16.9
Product S5 = 8.6
Product G9 = 10.4
Explanation:
Product K1 Product S5 Product G9
Contribution a $52.39 $20.64 $66.56
($147.39 - $95.00) ($112.64 - 92.00) ($215.56 - $149.00)
Number of Material
Required Per Unit b 3.1 2.4 6.4
Contribution margin
per pound 16.9 8.6 10.4
c = (a ÷ b)
Order in which products
should be produced
and filled 1 3 2
Answer:
a. Increase
Explanation:
The price earnings ratio is calculated by dividing the market value per share by the earning per share. This means that the price of the share is in the numerator and the earnings per share is in the denominator. If the denominator increases the ratio will decrease and if the numerator increases the ratio will increase. In this case the price of the stock which is the numerator increases from 15 to 18 whereas the earnings which is the denominator remains the same, this means that the price earnings ratio will increase. We can see this example numerically
We know the price of the stock was $15, lets assume the earnings were $1. So before the price change the earnings per share ratio would be 15/1= 15.
When price increases to $18 and earnings remain the same the new price earnings ratio will be 18/1=18. This proves that when earnings are constant and price per share increases the price earning ratio increases.
<span>voidable
</span><span>voidable
</span><span>voidable
</span><span>voidable
</span>
Answer:
When a sale is made, the ownership of goods is transferred immediately to the buyer of the goods. On the contrary, in case of hire purchase, the ownership of the asset is transferred to the hire purchaser, on the payment of the last installment.
Explanation:
hope this helps