The thing that both the prosecution and defense agree upon was that Eric was a schizophrenic. The thing on which the both disagreed was that the prosecution said that Eric knew that he was doing something wrong but defense did not agree.
The results of this case might mean that law of some nations could be in jeopardy because some countries provide insanity defense, where as some countries do not provide insanity defense at all.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The name of the story is HIGH COURT REVIEWS INSANITY-DEFENSE CASE. It is about a man who was from Arizona who had murdered, about the assassination of President Reagan.
This was known as the insanity defense because the man who had murdered the President was a psychotic and thus he was not found to be guilty because of his insanity.
A loving obedient child, who does laundry, cooks, does chores without being told to, takes care of siblings/pets, keeps room and house clean.
Caring, compassionate, polite, charismatic, trustworthy,generous, honest,etc.
Answer:
Some 4,500 crab-eating macaques that roam this ancient capital's streets, many of which occupy the crumbling Khmer-style Phra Prang Sam Yod -- aka Monkey Temple -- in the city center.
Explanation:
A jury acquitted<span> her on the grounds that the evidence against her was mostly circumstantial.
Also, go to this link
http://www.history.com/news/9-things-you-may-not-know-about-lizzie-borden
And look at #3, it should help even more
</span>