The correct answer is B. A low inflation rate! I hope this helps you!
Answer:
Step 1:
Start by setting it up with the divisor 20 on the left side and the dividend 16 on the right side like this:
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
Step 2:
The divisor (20) goes into the first digit of the dividend (1), 0 time(s). Therefore, put 0 on top:
0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
Step 3:
Multiply the divisor by the result in the previous step (20 x 0 = 0) and write that answer below the dividend.
0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
0
Step 4:
Subtract the result in the previous step from the first digit of the dividend (1 - 0 = 1) and write the answer below.
0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
- 0
1
Step 5:
Move down the 2nd digit of the dividend (6) like this:
0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
- 0
1 6
Step 6:
The divisor (20) goes into the bottom number (16), 0 time(s). Therefore, put 0 on top:
0 0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
- 0
1 6
Step 7:
Multiply the divisor by the result in the previous step (20 x 0 = 0) and write that answer at the bottom:
0 0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
- 0
1 6
0
Step 8:
Subtract the result in the previous step from the number written above it. (16 - 0 = 16) and write the answer at the bottom.
0 0
2 0 ⟌ 1 6
- 0
1 6
- 0
1 6
You are done, because there are no more digits to move down from the dividend.
The answer is the top number and the remainder is the bottom number.
Therefore, the answer to 16 divided by 20 calculated using Long Division is:
0
16 Remainder
Explanation:
Answer:
The general level of family's income is directly proportional to the amount of cash a family is likely to hold
Explanation:
Of the three motives of money, transactional motives of money relates to holding money(whether at hand or at bank) to meet daily transaction e.g buying of fuel/gas, transport fare to work place.
If the level of income of a family increases, other things being equal, the family tends to hold more money for their daily transaction. The level of income is directly proportional to amount of cash a family holds...
For example, family A earns $100 per week and holds $30 to meet daily transaction or unforeseen circumstances. If his pay increases to$150, it is intuitive for Mr A to hold higher money, lets say $50
Net annual cash flows
1,200+10,000=11,200
Net present value is
PV of annual cash flows-project investment
11,200×2.4018−30,000=(3,100)
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
