write about the punctuality of time and importance of work and use thesaurus for good vocabulary
Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
<span>Humanistic therapy has a lot in common with psychodynamic approaches to psychology.
In psychodynamic approach, we conduct the psychological analysis with the assumption that our current behavior and feelings are strongly correlated with our experience in the past.
Humanistic therapy is similar to this because it's a form of therapy that help people to find happiness by identifying ALL THE MEANINGFUL things that they had up to this day.</span>
Answer:
The best answer to the question: The following are examples of advances made during the Mesolithic Era, except:___, would be, C: Fishing nets.
Explanation:
The Mesolithic is a period that neatly meets between the Paleolithic Age and the Neolithic. The exact time in different regions of the world, in which this Period began, varies quite a bit. However, there have been some commonaities that have been found among the different groups of people, all of them hunter-gatherers, that lived and subsisted in particularly Northern Africa, Northern Europe and Western Europe, and parts of Asia, as far as it has been known. The first is the use of stone tools, of fine making, called microliths. The second was the advancement in the making of certains artifacts, for various reasons. Among the artifacts that have been found from this time, and that were made by people of this Era, are: pottery (the most common finding), bows and arrows, with which they would hunt, and canoes, small ones, to be able to fish, close to where they lived. The one thing they did not develop until after, was the fishing net.
This is of course a subjective question, but there are probably two aspects which can contribute to being a good politician
- good education (either from a university or self-taught) about the history (both of country and of the world), economics politics and social studies
- good connection to the life of average people: being raised in a poor area, visiting poor areas more frequently: not to loose "contact with reality" and to know the citizens' actual needs.
