Answer:
Thank you for the free points!
Explanation:
When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4
Answer:
Girls and Women
Explanation:
Girls and Women who play sports have higher levels of confidence and self-esteem and lower levels of depression.
There’s no such thing as that (I’m South Korean)
Answer:
What you need to know about an unfamiliar discipline in order to draw upon its insights and critically analyze them
Explanation:
Possessing disciplinary adequacy means sufficient and ample comprehension of a discipline enough to grasp it edges, boundaries and how it can be critically analyzed. It means understanding how the discipline views the world such as in terms of its theories, assumptions, methods, concepts or perspectives. In other words to have disciplinary adequacy only requires that one understand a discipline enough to know its cognitive map in terms of how it approaches and views the problem/subject
