Okay, I will give you ideas. Lets make this guy's name Marsel, and lets say he is single, as he is around 25, and lives with his parents, and works as a surgeon. He is a tall, thin man who is a genius. His income is higher than average, and is at the higher end of the income spectrum. His business is to treat patients by cutting open their body and performing the necessary operations. He has to go to perform surgery at any time he is called, however likes spending time with his parents teaching them about the human body. His attitude toward religion is neutral, he practices it, but doesn't have much time to practice it. Toward politics he doesn't care except for picking the candidate of the party that he prefers. Toward people in general he isn't very social, but if he sees someone hurt, he has sympathy towards them. He doesn't mind animals, and doesn't care much about them, except if the animal needs something.
For the son, he is a short and chubby 3 year old boy who is curious to see new things and is playful. He makes his mom take care of him a lot.
PS: Since this doesn't make sense, if you have to, you can say that he is married.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A. Our country can no longer refuse involvement because it can not allow freedom and peace to be at risk.
Explanation:
This excerpt from, "Wilson's War Message to Congress," is clearly discouraging neutrality. Neutrality is the act of not being involved or taking sides in a dispute. Wilson explained that in a world where some governments have made themselves autocratic, thus stifling peace and freedom of citizens, it would be wrong to be neutral, not making efforts to salvage the situation.
Wilson in this paragraph encouraged participation in governance so that citizens can resist actions from the government that are autocratic in nature.
Answer:
I think D would be the best choice
Explanation:
because when being bias you can be against it or for it and D has all of those things unlike A,B,or C. They focus on just one negative or positive aspect
The lower creatures speak to the greater part. When you take a gander at the manner in which socialism and communism have verifiably assumed control whole social orders you see that it takes the "lower" creatures to become tied up with what the little group of authority is advancing. These kinds of social orders are engendered; individuals are attracted and yet what they're being sold. At the point when a vast gathering of individuals (or creatures) lives in a general public where their necessities are being met, they have no cash, ect., the guarantee of "allows all offer," and everybody is equivalent," are extremely engaging. In the event that you trusted that you'd discover a calling and work for $50,000 every year, and afterward you discovered that under a specific sort of government your neighbor down the road would make the same amount of for doing nothing...... let me know, would you work. Okay feel any draw whatsoever to practice or achieve your maximum capacity in the event that you realized that everybody would share an equivalent part of the riches in any case? That is the thing that makes America awesome; free enterprise. Hence, to comprehend what truly occurred on the ranch, or Russia maybe, it was fundamental for Orwell to compose the story the manner in which he did with the end goal for us to see how ground-breaking publicity truly is.
