We can't use SAS to prove these triangles are congruent because they're not proportional to two corresponding sides.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
It should be noted that the SAS similarity criterion states that when two sides of one triangle are proportional to two corresponding sides of another, and when the included angles are equal, the two triangles are similar.
In this case, we can't use SAS to prove these triangles are congruent because they're not proportional to two corresponding sides.
Learn more about SAS on:
brainly.com/question/3999145
#SPJ1
Answer:
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Step-by-step explanation:
bbbbbbbbb
Answer:
y = -1/3x + 2
Step-by-step explanation:
The gradient of the given line is 3 because (y = mx +c where m is the gradient)
Therefore, to find the gradient of the perpendicular line (at 90 degrees), you need to find the negative reciprocal.
The negative reciprocal of 3 is -1/3 because imagine if 3 = 3/1, to get the reciprocal, you flip it, and to get the negative, you just flip the sign.
Now we know that Line M is y = -1/3x + c, we need to find the y-intercept.
To do this, just input the point (3,1) into y = -1/3x + c, to get c. This is because we know (3,1) is on the line from the question.
So it would be 1 = (-1/3 x 3) +c
Which would be 1 = -1 +c
And so c = 2
Put everything together and you get y = -1/3x + 2
2 Pies. If she cuts the first pie for 5 people she only needs one more pie for the 6th person
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that
We have to find the fourth roots of given complex number.
By using the formula
Angle of rotation=
Therefore, the four roots of given complex number are
