The answer is false. President Coolidge did something about lynching, attention to education, minimum wages for women workers and other progressive measures. But my instincts tell me that he did.
Answer:
The possibilities of development in Nepal:
Nepalese People.
Education system and thinking capabity.
Decentralisation.
Economic development.
Explanation:
Nepal can develop by using the mentioned way and also they can follow several steps for their development.
Commercial mass production can be achieved with the use of the latest technology. The massive production methods would bring down the cost of explores.
The untapped land of tourism could attract a lot of foreign visitors to this part of the world.
Investment can be made in hydro electric projects, roadways along with basic structures of infrastructure.
Organic food is another area that can be tapped as the local youth can emphasize on organic farming
Answer:
B. States can use double jeopardy
Explanation:
What is important here in this case is the ruling. This case is one that is concerned with the double Jeopardy clause. Benton ruled here that this clause, which is a fifth amendment clause is applicable to the States. the major aim of this class is to offer protection to a defendant against a second prosecution or trial for the same offence that they have been convicted of.
Answer:
<em>Deception</em>
Explanation:
Deception
In research deception is a dishonest way of conduction research, in which the participants are given different information about a study. The participant of such research is not aware of the reason why such an analysis is carried out until the outcome is known. Deception in the researcher can also be intentionally withholding of some of the vital information needed for the participants to carry out the research effectively.
An illustration
Deception some times is used by the researcher to obtain accurate information. In our illustration, the researcher wants to study cheating, and he employs deception. The researcher opted for deception so that by withholding the true knowledge, the participants would act naturally. The above is a clear case of deception by the researcher
