The Answer to your question is:
False.
"because the author can write the book however they want"
Side note:
"Talking about: chronological written in the order that events occur in real time flashback a change in the storytelling order where the current action flashes back to the past flash forward a change in the storytelling order where the current action flashes to the future"
Quoted answers are NOT Mine. I take NO credit/responsibility for this answer.
Further information / sources may be provided at:
http://openstudy.com/updates/5302985de4b024fe26e2b550
I am only here to help, Not to get into trouble. I hope you understand.
Edgar Allen Poe's validity and reliability on the Spanish Inquisition can be made clearly through the text in "The Pit and the Pendulum". The narrator is valid because his story relates to the history of the Spanish Inquisition but unreliable because of his mental state. The Koch Blog says, " During the reign of the Catholic Monarchs, several thousand new Christians were condemned..." The narrator in the story was judged, put through hell, and tortured enough that he just wanted to end his life. As John Calvin states, "The torture of a bad conscience is the hell of a living soul."
Answer:
The answer is D. The audience is not receptive to the speaker's point of view.
Explanation:
An <em>euphemism </em>is a word or a sentence that you use when you want say something that the other person may find offensive or unpleasant.
For example:
- your parents may say that someone passed away rather that that person died.
- a boss may say that they had to let someone go, rather then saying they had to fire someone.
- a person may be called portly or big-boned rather then overweight or fat.
Answer:
c) It helps me visualize what the author is describing.
Explanation:
I narrowed it down to B and D. Going to say D though
