1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pachacha [2.7K]
3 years ago
14

Do you think the Sedition Act is fair or is it too harsh? Why? Would you be willing to give up your freedom of speech in exchang

e for a guarantee of safety? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
Vladimir [108]3 years ago
4 0
The sedition act is fair because will needs points I would not be willing to give up freedom of speech for safety
You might be interested in
What do the graphs show? federal spending was causing the national debt to grow. the national debt was shrinking over time. fede
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:A

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What is collective bargaining
nevsk [136]
Collective bargaining are negotiation of wages and other conditions of employment by an organized body of employees. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read Sonnet 13 by Elizabeth Barrett Browning now. It is located on page 76 of your Journeys anthology. What does this poem say t
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

Brainliest please

Explanation:

By reading the lyric Sonnet 13 by Elizabeth Barrett, it's possible to understand that the cherished wants the speaker to find enough words to express her love. The lyric says"The love I bear thee, chancing words enough, And hold the arsonist out, while the winds are rough, Between our faces, to cast light on each?" using images to indicate that it's asked from the speaker that she finds the words to express what's inside of her, by" holding the arsonist out", indeed though the winds are rough, what could put her passions in peril. The cherished requires that the speaker would cast" light"on both of their faces, enlighting their connection and relationship, and that could only be done if she took action"into speech", as the lyric says," chancing words enough"to express herself.

The speaker responds to the cherished's request by questioning it, which can be understood because she ends up" (.) to cast light on each?"with a question mark. Also, the speaker says"I can not educate My hand to hold my spirit so far out From myself (.) of love hid in me out of reach". The lyric implies that the cherished's request is insolvable to be fulfilled because it's out of her reach. Expressing her love is commodity that the speaker can not" educate"herself, because that would drive her most deep feelings, her" spirit", down. She ends up saying"Nay, let the silence of my womanishness Recommend my woman- love to thy belief (.) By a most undauntable, speechless fiber, Lest one touch of this heart convey its grief"which means that she denies the cherished's request, by letting her silence commit and recognize her" woman- love", her passions, in a fiber held with determination. The speaker intends to avoid the threat of love end up causing loss and grief in her life, indeed if it's the loss of herself.

The speaker response suggests that she has real passions, that they're strong inside herself. They're pictured as a" arsonist" able to" cast light on each". When she says" love hid", it can be understood that the love is there, but hidden inside her and that expressing it would be betraying herself. Putting her love in speech, transubstantiating it into words, the speaker would risk her spirit and deepest identity. She denies the cherished's request, which means that she has a strong personality, that she knows herself, and isn't willing to put her most precious passions at threat. The lyric says" (.) I stand unwon, still asked", what proves how delicate it's to" win"the speaker and make her break her fiber. Still, she can also be seen as a person spooked of opening up and taking pitfalls, who always prefers to stay in elision.

4 0
3 years ago
According to Kennedy, what is the question of the New Frontier?
liq [111]
Will the United States succeed in a changing world?
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
My question is in the picture, please answer it.
densk [106]

Answer:

B: Two-party.

Explanation:

The two-party answer best describes the generality of the party system in the United States. Throughout much of the American history, two major parties have fought for the office. Third parties do exist, but they have not yet reached the same level of power as the two major parties mentioned.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following quotes supports the ideals of the 1st amendment? *
    6·2 answers
  • What term is used to describe the American belief that the u.s would come to control all or most of North America ?
    12·2 answers
  • How did columbus decide that he could reach the indies by sailing west?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the anti-federalists oppose the idea of having a president?
    7·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from the Edicts of Ashoka.
    6·2 answers
  • HOW DID SHAYS REBELLION HELP LEAD TO A CHANGE IN THE NATIONS GOVERMENTS
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these national government buildings was attacked by terrorists on September 11, 2001?
    8·1 answer
  • The framers of the U.S. Constitution hoped to avoid unnecessary changes to the document by making the amendment process fairly d
    11·1 answer
  • In a well-written paragraph, explain how George Washington set precedents for the office of the president
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Code of Hammurabi influence civilizations that followed?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!