Answer:
175.5y
Step-by-step explanation:
9 (1.5) = 13.5
13.5 (13) = 175.5
175.5 (1y) = 175.5y
Answer:
one solution only
Step-by-step explanation:
16y + 7 = -3y + 10 + 8y
16y + 3y - 8y = 10 - 7
11y = 3
y = 3/11
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
We have perpendicular bisector through a chord of the circle. We know the length, so either side of the chord is 11 due to the bisector cutting it directly in half. Since the radius is a fixed distance from the center to any point on the edge of the circle, we can draw the radius x from the circle to the end of the chord to form a right triangle.
We can use Pythagorean Theorem 
to find the missing side length x. a=6, b=11 and c=x.
Answer:
x = $11400
Step-by-step explanation:
Naomi is paid $190 per week plus 5.5% of her total sales in dollars, x, which can be represented by g ( x ) = 190 + 0.055 x.
And Josiah is paid $475 per week plus 3% of his total sales in dollars, x, which can be represented by f ( x ) = 475 + 0.03 x
Let the weekly pat for them are equal.
Then, g(x) = f(x)
⇒ 190 + 0.055 x = 475 + 0.03 x
⇒ 0.025 x = 285
⇒ x = $11400
Therefore, for the value of x = $11400, that will make their weekly pay the same. (Answer)
Answer:
No , the cause and effect can be finished up through analyses as it were.
What we have in the inquiry is only an observational investigation where we basically study 3000 grown-ups and attempt to outline the outcomes with no trial proof.
Imagine a scenario in which individuals who had breakfast normally were inclined to maintain their weight reduction, for sure if individuals who keep up weight reduction will in general have breakfast routinely.
henceforth the circumstances and logical results relationship cannot be built up
So as to do so , one must lead measurable trials, for example, autonomous example t test or ANOVA examination
