1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
3 years ago
13

What inference can you make by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza?

English
2 answers:
tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer to the first question (what can be inferred by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza) is D) The awful tempest rages all night long and terrifies the speaker of the poem.
The first two stanzas, through adjectives like "awful" and "gaunt", expressions like "spectre's cloak" and "creatures", and verbs like "chuckled", "whistled" and "gnashed", convey that the tempest was terrifying, which can be understood by the speaker's word choice when telling the reader about it.
The last stanza shows that the storm lasted all night when the speaker says "morning lit", and, by expressing her relief and how peaceful she thought everything was after the storm had passed, the speaker intensifies the idea that it had been a terrifying storm. So, the correct answer to this question would be D.
Answer A is not correct because nothing indicates that the speaker would be fascinated by the storm, rather scared. Answer B is not correct because the tempest is not saddened by the morning sun, on the contrary, the speaker shows his relief and peace almost with happiness, which can be inferred by the presence of an exclamation mark in the last verse. Answer C is not correct because the tempest is not saddened at first, it is scary.
The correct answer to the second question (what device did Dickinson employ to create the effect in lines 1 and 2) is C) Paradox.
A paradox is a statement that seems to be contradictory in logic, that seems to not be true, but that also is not false. The speaker creates an absurd effect by using a paradox to describe the tempest when she suggests a storm with gaunt and few clouds. So, the correct answer to this question would be C.
Answer A isn't correct, the device used by Dickinson couldn't be an hyperbole because that figure of speech would cause the contrary effect; the storm would be shown like something grandiose and extremely terrifying, with an exaggerated connotation. Answer B isn't correct because there is no presence of an onomatopoeia in both lines since there is no written sound. Answer D isn't correct because the storm is not personified with human characteristics, rather the clouds are "gaunt", which is an adjective that can refer to objects.
The correct answer to the third question (why did Dickinson most likely use the phrase "black, as of a spectre's cloak" in the first stanza) is D) to create a feeling of darkness and gloom.
The black spectre's cloak mentioned is an image that describes how the gaunt and few clouds created a dark plain sky that covered the earth and the heaven, leaving everything dark and gloomy. That was the storm's appearance. Therefore, the correct answer to this question would be D.
Answer A is not correct because, although the storm could have been a dream, nothing in the poem indicates that it was; on the contrary, the description of the storm going away in the morning indicates that it wasn't a bad dream, but something real. Answer B is not correct because the black cloak mentioned doesn't transmit a sensation of coldness but of darkness. Answer C is not correct because the poem isn't comic, not even slightly, and this expression makes it even darker.
The correct answer to the last question (how does the poet convey the seriousness of the storm) is A) She uses personification to emphasize the impact of the storm.
When the poet describes the storm as a "monster" whose "faded eyes turned slowly to his native coast", she is using personification to emphasize how serious the storm was, as if it were like a monster with eyes that can turn, and with power and strength. Hence, the correct answer to this question is A.
Answer B isn't correct because neither does the poet use paradoxes in the last stanza nor does she show the storm as majestic. Answer C isn't correct because she doesn't use informal language and the storm seems to have been very serious and strong, and not the opposite. Answer D isn't correct because she doesn't show the changes that are coming through metaphors, the poet actually shows only the peaceful feeling that was left when the storm was gone.
GaryK [48]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The speaker is fascinated by the tempest, but glad to see it leave.

The correct answer to the first question (what can be inferred by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza) is D) The awful tempest rages all night long and terrifies the speaker of the poem.

The first two stanzas, through adjectives like "awful" and "gaunt", expressions like "spectre's cloak" and "creatures", and verbs like "chuckled", "whistled" and "gnashed", convey that the tempest was terrifying, which can be understood by the speaker's word choice when telling the reader about it.

The last stanza shows that the storm lasted all night when the speaker says "morning lit", and, by expressing her relief and how peaceful she thought everything was after the storm had passed, the speaker intensifies the idea that it had been a terrifying storm. So, the correct answer to this question would be D.

Answer A is not correct because nothing indicates that the speaker would be fascinated by the storm, rather scared. Answer B is not correct because the tempest is not saddened by the morning sun, on the contrary, the speaker shows his relief and peace almost with happiness, which can be inferred by the presence of an exclamation mark in the last verse. Answer C is not correct because the tempest is not saddened at first, it is scary.

The correct answer to the second question (what device did Dickinson employ to create the effect in lines 1 and 2) is C) Paradox.

A paradox is a statement that seems to be contradictory in logic, that seems to not be true, but that also is not false. The speaker creates an absurd effect by using a paradox to describe the tempest when she suggests a storm with gaunt and few clouds. So, the correct answer to this question would be C.

Answer A isn't correct, the device used by Dickinson couldn't be an hyperbole because that figure of speech would cause the contrary effect; the storm would be shown like something grandiose and extremely terrifying, with an exaggerated connotation. Answer B isn't correct because there is no presence of an onomatopoeia in both lines since there is no written sound. Answer D isn't correct because the storm is not personified with human characteristics, rather the clouds are "gaunt", which is an adjective that can refer to objects.

The correct answer to the third question (why did Dickinson most likely use the phrase "black, as of a spectre's cloak" in the first stanza) is D) to create a feeling of darkness and gloom.

The black spectre's cloak mentioned is an image that describes how the gaunt and few clouds created a dark plain sky that covered the earth and the heaven, leaving everything dark and gloomy. That was the storm's appearance. Therefore, the correct answer to this question would be D.

Answer A is not correct because, although the storm could have been a dream, nothing in the poem indicates that it was; on the contrary, the description of the storm going away in the morning indicates that it wasn't a bad dream, but something real. Answer B is not correct because the black cloak mentioned doesn't transmit a sensation of coldness but of darkness. Answer C is not correct because the poem isn't comic, not even slightly, and this expression makes it even darker.

The correct answer to the last question (how does the poet convey the seriousness of the storm) is A) She uses personification to emphasize the impact of the storm.

When the poet describes the storm as a "monster" whose "faded eyes turned slowly to his native coast", she is using personification to emphasize how serious the storm was, as if it were like a monster with eyes that can turn, and with power and strength. Hence, the correct answer to this question is A.

Answer B isn't correct because neither does the poet use paradoxes in the last stanza nor does she show the storm as majestic. Answer C isn't correct because she doesn't use informal language and the storm seems to have been very serious and strong, and not the opposite. Answer D isn't correct because she doesn't show the changes that are coming through metaphors, the poet actually shows only the peaceful feeling that was left when the storm was gone.

You might be interested in
Read this line from the story.
padilas [110]

Answer:

C The sight motivates him to go out and rid the earth of evil.

Explanation:

Fortune favors us, dear Sancho," said Don Quixote, gesturing toward the plain. "She

has deemed us worthy to battle and slay these thirty-no, these forty--monstrous giants.

Sweeping so evil a breed from the face of the earth is a righteous service."

How does seeing the windmills affect Don Quixote's journey?

А He decides the windmills are a sign that he should find and destroy forty giants.

6 0
3 years ago
The base of an exponential function can only be a positive number true or false
patriot [66]

it is true - APEX Rate 5 stars thanks

3 0
3 years ago
In "Thank You, M'am," which line is an example of dialect?
Rudik [331]
Your answer is A......................
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would "In a Station of the Metro" change if the bough was bright and lively rather than wet and black?
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

A.)The station would seem cheerier.

Explanation:

Cage clarifies watching faces appear in a metro station. It is misty whether he is composing from the vantage purpose of an explorer on the train itself or on the stage.

The background is Paris, France, and as he clarifies these faces as an audience, showing the station is very busy.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a letter to your younger brother advising him to pursue IT or sports training during the vacation
klio [65]
Let’s say your brother’s name is Jason
Dear Jason,
I heard you’re going for a vacation, first of all I hope you’re doing well. You know since you’re going out for a vacation take this as an opportunity and why don’t you try playing a sport? Basketball, Volleyball, Swimming, there’s a lot of options. It’s also healthy for you which is great. If you’re lazy and don’t want to play any sports why don’t you try information technology(IT)? It’s like a second language if you know IT very well and in this timeline technology plays a very important part. I hope you do any of these activities! And enjoy your vacation.
Your sister/brother,
(Your name)
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Across the Universe poem main idea
    11·1 answer
  • What is the effect of tea cake slapping janie ?
    10·1 answer
  • I need help inevidence based claim paragraphs about certain parts of the odyssey, please help!
    6·1 answer
  • Based on this passage of The Odyssey, one can conclude that the ancient Greeks greatly valued .
    9·1 answer
  • The main purpose of Edwards sermon is to
    7·2 answers
  • 5
    15·1 answer
  • The most common adverb suffix is the _____ suffix.<br><br> -ward<br> -long<br> -ly<br> -way
    7·1 answer
  • 32. Which of the following sentences contain a spelling mistake?
    7·1 answer
  • Who does the narrator in
    12·2 answers
  • Has America changed its views on immigration
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!