Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.
In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.
The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
I think it’s necessary because it sets boundaries and keeps people safe. Some people don’t follow them, but when/if they get caught they have to serve a punishment as the effect of what they did. Sometimes people whose jobs have power think that the power belongs to them too, which makes them think they are above the law, but they’re not. People do accept them and if there is a wrong or stupid law, especially now-a-days people will go on social media and speak their opinions. (Hope this was helpful!)
Answer:
Explanation:
The power to go public, power of persuasion, make executive agreements, issue executive orders, issue signing statements, create & use bureaucracy, personality and leadership, and make legislative proposals.
Answer:
The difference between the rate law for a reaction and the integrated rate law of a reaction is:
<u>Rate law shows the relationship between the rate of reaction and the concentrations of the reactants. </u>
<u>The integrated rate law is a relationship between the concentration of the reactant and time.</u>
Explanation:
The rate law for a chemical reaction considers the concentration or pressure of the reactants.
The integrated rate law is an equation that consideres the reactants as a function of time.
