Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Embezzlement. He is taking (stealing) asserts that we’re entrusted to him. Bad Bart!
Answer:
B. Diplomatic Relations
Explanation:
Anything involving peaceful relationships and communications between multiple countries is diplomatic relations
Answer:
The cancellation of vouchers by treasurer personnel
Explanation:
When a business uses vendors for some of its service needs there is the possibility of paying vendors twice for the same service of invoice is submitted twice.
The treasurer is the person that disbursed funds to vendors for services rendered. He is tasked with cross checking if payments are duplicated.
To avoid this it is best to have the treasurer personnel cancel vouchers that have been paid.
This will provide an effective check on duplicate payments.
