Answer:
An argument relies on a comparison of two things
Explanation:
Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren’t really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
Analogy: a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
Answer:
Answer:1. the car, which took Miah months of saving to buy, is parked in the garage.
2. Sierra met the boy whose parents recently opened the restaurant across the street
3. The bicycle that Kameron has had since he was ten years old is still in great shape.
Explanation:
Explanation: the first sentence is a non-restrictive relative clause by making use of comma. The last two sentences are restrictive relative clause. It does not make use of comma. In all the three sentences, the relative clause indicator ( which, whose and that) is present.
Answer:
I wake up to the smell of cookies
Walking downstairs, I see my parents bake
They smile at me and tell me to eat.
My brother runs down the stairs
And asks what they're making.
They reply cookies, and he sits.
So it's just the three of us
Sitting together, a family
Smiles, laughter, and cookies.
Explanation:
Is this good?
number one is Choice d . number two is Choice C . number three is Choice a . number four is Choice a
