Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The answer would be 48 √6
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here are the steps to follow when solving absolute value inequalities:
Isolate the absolute value expression on the left side of the inequality.
If the number on the other side of the inequality sign is negative, your equation either has no solution or all real numbers as solutions.
If your problem has a greater than sign (your problem now says that an absolute value is greater than a number), then set up an "or" compound inequality that looks like this:
(quantity inside absolute value) < -(number on other side)
OR
(quantity inside absolute value) > (number on other side)
The same setup is used for a ³ sign.
If your absolute value is less than a number, then set up a three-part compound inequality that looks like this:
-(number on other side) < (quantity inside absolute value) < (number on other side)
The same setup is used for a £ sign
