Answer:
Overhead Cost - S1 = $30201
Explanation:
To assign Overhead costs to S1, we first need to calculate the Overhead Absorption rate for Machining and Order filling.
The Overhead Absorption rate for Machining is calculated by dividing the Machining Overheads by the number of Machine hours to calculate $ Overhead per Machine Hour.
- Total Machining Hours = 11500 + 3600 = 15100
- Machining = $11325 / 15100 Hours = $0.75 / Machine Hour
Now we do the same calculation for Order Filling Overheads and divide them by Number of Orders.
- Total Number of Orders = 270 + 1240 = 1510
- Order Filling = 26274 / 1510 = $17.4 per order
Now we allocate the Overheads to S1 on the basis of Machine Hours and Number of orders relating to S1.
- S1 Overheads = 0.75 × 11500 + 17.4 × 1240 = $30201
Answer:
A. Enter an object specific action to Account and put it in the Account Layout.
Explanation:
Enter an object specific action to Account and put it in the Account Layout.
Machinery repairs, property taxes, salaries for workers variable: number of workers, what crop is being produced, gas for machinery.
Answer:
Letter C is correct. <u>Assigning different workers to different tasks.</u>
Explanation:
The division of labor corresponds to the specialization of tasks so that the work process is more dynamic, fast and efficient.
This specialization of functions and tasks began with the consolidation of capitalism that maximized industrial production.
Therefore, the need arose to divide the work so that the employee had more learning and training in the execution of repeated tasks, which reduces the working time and increases the productivity of the employee.
Therefore, the ideal is for an organization to be an integrated system, where regardless of the division of labor and the specialization of the function, there is collaboration, integration and there is no alienation of the worker not knowing all the steps that make up the organization as a whole. Functional flexibility is ideal for a company to have employees with different capabilities that together will contribute to the achievement of organizational objectives and goals
Answer:
Yes, these facts are valid against Hannah which comes under Ratification Doctrine.
Explanation:
Here in the question its given that Hannah had allowed her friend to lend her computer for a one week period which was during her thanks giving break.
During those times Carol sold that laptop to a friend which was one of them in their class without asking hannah about this.
Now when after the break hannah and carol both return then carol told her that she had sold her laptop because she was getting an amount from the buyer which was too good to pass up so shesold it that moment.
Now when she gave that money to Hannah she instead of scolding her thanked her and her expression was seeming to be like she had done an awsome job for her.
So, based on the facts the contract was valid because it came under Ratification Doctrine.