Answer:
c. A coastal area with fertile soil
Explanation:
People are more likely to densely populated a <em>coastal area with fertile soil</em>. On the one hand, coastal area provides <u>access to the water</u>. If it's the coastal area of the sea or ocean it is likely to mean possibility of transportation and goods import / export. The <u>fertile soil</u>, on the other hand means possibility to grow crops, vegetables and fruits that would feed the population. Take the example of California, which is the most populous state in the United States.
The problem with no name.
Betty Friedan is a feminist and known as "The Feminine Mystique". For the problem of the housewife, she is sure to have "the problem with no name". Friedan described the dissatisfaction they endured as “the problem with no name,” and wrote of its terrible toll on the mental health of American women. Thousands of women recognized themselves in the pages of her study and were inspired to join the growing movement for women's rights. <span>She described the unhappiness of suburban “housewives,” who felt unrewarded by the tasks of their daily lives and guilty for not feeling more fulfilled. While other writers complained that higher education undermined women's abilities to undertake their traditional roles as wives and mothers, she argued instead that women were unfairly confined by the expectation that they should stay at home and focus all of their energies on family life.</span>
Based on the socio-political analysis, it has been observed that institutions help make a state's commitments more credible by making them commit to doing something in a public and formal manner.
<h3>What is Commitment?</h3>
Commitment is a term that is used to describe the agreement or pledge made by individuals, States, or groups of people to perform something in the future.
Usually, States are known to go against their promises, however, institutions help make states' commitments more credible by making them do things in a public and formal manner.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is that "<u>they make them commit to doing something in a public and formal manner."</u>
Learn more about State commitment here: brainly.com/question/29548483
#SPJ1
This may be a debate as well but I would like to clarify that:
Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral (answer to the question)
We do not say eating tofu is obviously morally neutral, so I do not have to ask about harm or good, instead it is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral.